The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 986 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
I will follow on from where Jeremy Balfour left off. I am not sure whether I am pronouncing the acronym correctly, but DACBEAG—the disability and carer benefit expert advisory group—has essentially already advised ministers on EIA. I am keen to understand Dr Simpson’s view. If another non-statutory group were to be created, would it be able to provide the required advice on any detailed policy development for EIA, or would that have to sit somewhere else?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
Thank you. I appreciate that today’s evidence is for context, convener, so I will leave my questioning there.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
Can you also give us an update about the work of the guidance rewrite group? How will updated guidance be communicated to local authorities? You spoke about local authorities having a key role in disseminating information, so how do we ensure that implementation is smooth for local authorities?
09:15Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
To what extent has the social work profession been engaged in all that work, either through Social Work Scotland or through the representative bodies?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
My question builds on that. As you have outlined, minister, information and advice are available. I am keen to understand how people are made aware of that. That applies particularly to kinship carers who are entering into a kinship arrangement for the first time and are navigating a new landscape. What action has been taken by the Government and its agencies to ensure that that information is getting out to people?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
To what extent have they raised concerns about capacity and resource in local authorities to deliver an updated and refreshed framework and to implement the changes that we are talking about on the front line?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
I was previously a councillor, from 2012 to 2022.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
That is very helpful.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
Following on from that discussion, I have questions about Government input and ministerial oversight. I would like to hear our witnesses’ general views on the fact that the bill would give the Government powers to review regulators’ performance.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
The Government has written to the committee to say that it is considering amending the bill in order to reduce the influence of ministers. I know that the legal profession and the bodies to which we have made reference today are concerned about that ministerial oversight. In the light of what you have just said, is there adequate scope to amend the bill to reduce ministerial oversight?