The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 986 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
The Law Society had quite a bit to say about section 6 being too narrow—for example, it does not cover estate agency work and incidental financial business, which the public would recognise as being long established in the sector more broadly. Why did you arrive at the feeling that the section is narrow, and how might the bill be amended to widen the scope?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
That is very helpful. The committee would be keen to see that.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
I am grateful for those contributions. It is helpful for the committee to have that on the public record as well as in your written statements. In relation to how the bill might change, it is useful to understand your view that the bill would have to be substantially rewritten in order to achieve some of what has been set out by other witnesses from whom we have heard.
I appreciate that the Association of Construction Attorneys takes a different view. How was that view arrived at, and what is your view of the discussion that we have just had?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
Good morning to the panel. I would like to understand the witnesses’ views on the proposed membership of SEIAC. We have had a lot of submissions about who should be in and who should not be in. The bill sets out the balance between employees and employers and the types of expertise. In your view, is it the right mix or are there things missing from the proposal in the bill?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
Lucy Kenyon, your submission mentioned the need to broaden the scope of the membership. Do you want to comment on that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
I think that you are making an argument for that formal role within the SEIAC membership, but I wonder whether, more broadly, there is an opportunity to widen the scope via people or organisations having observer status and being able to share views, opinions and expertise. Although I take the point that you make about having a formal status, do you agree that there is opportunity beyond that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
It is useful to hear the degree to which consensus can be achieved. There is certainly an appetite for consensus. I am keen for the committee to get access to the further detail.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
Good morning, panel. It has been interesting to hear your perspectives. The committee is interested in how the bill might change as it goes through the parliamentary process, particularly in light of the amendments that have been suggested or discussed by those who have given evidence and the Government. I will start by asking about amendments.
As we have heard this morning, the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission has backed the oversight powers for ministers in the bill. That is in contrast to the views of the Law Society and the Faculty of Advocates. However, the Government has intimated that it may lodge amendments to change the nature of that oversight. Mr Stevenson, I would like to get a sense of why the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission arrived at its view. What is your view on the proposed amendments? The expression “watering down” has been used. Might the amendments change the nature of those powers?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
In your written response to question 9 in the call for views, you propose technical amendments. They have been suggested a lot as a way to tighten the bill. Can you provide an update on any discussion that you have had with the Government on such amendments and any progress to date?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
That is helpful. Colin, you said that there are nine practical and proportionate fixes that could provide a framework for your activities. Will you update us on those and give SSDT’s view of the proposed amendments?