Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 21 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 986 contributions

|

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Budget Scrutiny 2024-25

Meeting date: 25 January 2024

Paul O'Kane

In relation to the 27 per cent cut, the Joseph Rowntree Foundation said in its written submission to the Finance and Public Administration Committee that it is

“baffling that the affordable housing supply programme should be the victim of such a brutal cut as the one announced in the Scottish Budget 2024-25”.

Given the impact on children and families in poverty, to what extent have the cabinet secretary and her officials undertaken an equality impact assessment of that cut?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Budget Scrutiny 2024-25

Meeting date: 25 January 2024

Paul O'Kane

Can I ask one more question?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Budget Scrutiny 2024-25

Meeting date: 25 January 2024

Paul O'Kane

The point was about—

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Scottish Human Rights Commission

Meeting date: 16 January 2024

Paul O'Kane

Sorry. I decided not to touch any buttons because of Fulton MacGregor’s experience earlier, but I should probably have pressed something.

I have a question about the universal periodic review. When the commission wrote the committee about the UK’s fourth cycle of that periodic review, which took place in November 2022, it said that it would be encouraging the UK and Scottish Governments to work constructively together before the formal response to the UPR report was sent. The response was published in March of last year. I am keen to get your views and your assessment of the UK Government’s response and, if you want to comment on this, to hear whether you think that the two Governments worked together on it or whether there could have been more opportunities for that constructive working.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Scottish Human Rights Commission

Meeting date: 16 January 2024

Paul O'Kane

It is important to the committee that we understand the Scottish Human Rights Commission’s views on that, the extent to which there has been collaboration and whether there needs to be follow-up scrutiny, so that undertaking to come back to the committee with the detail is really helpful.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Scottish Human Rights Commission

Meeting date: 16 January 2024

Paul O'Kane

No. That was very useful in terms of the wider piece of work around commissioners. I will pause there.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Scottish Human Rights Commission

Meeting date: 16 January 2024

Paul O'Kane

My first question, which is perhaps for Jan Savage in the first instance, is focused on the resourcing of the commission. The commission has not used its power to conduct an inquiry. As we know, it has had to pause litigation work due to capacity issues. Does the commission have sufficient financial and staffing resources to meet its current duties and obligations in Scotland?

We know that there will be future challenges for the commission, and that new duties and powers might arise from the human rights bill. Will you comment on what those challenges might be and the potential need for further resourcing to cover them?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Scottish Human Rights Commission

Meeting date: 16 January 2024

Paul O'Kane

Thank you. Those helpful comments answer some of my supplementary questions.

What is interesting is the discussion and debate around powers for a purpose—new powers for the commission with that sense of purpose. I noted in the “At a crossroads” report the consideration of the wider landscape and the increase in the number of called-for commissioners on a variety of issues that would impact the human rights of individuals. In the Parliament, and perhaps more widely, we are having something of a debate around the need for commissioners, the growth in their numbers and the challenges therein. Do you want to expand more on your views about the increase in the call for commissioners in different areas and perhaps how those calls interact with the work of the SHRC? We have heard a bit about that already. What role does the SHRC feel that it could play instead of some of those other options being taken forward? I do not refer to any commissioner proposal in isolation but more broadly to the principle.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Budget Scrutiny 2024-25

Meeting date: 11 January 2024

Paul O'Kane

That is helpful. There is a degree of uncertainty around the new benefits that are coming on stream this year, particularly the pension-age disability payment, which will replace the attendance allowance. You have said that costings remain highly uncertain in that space. To what extent has your experience of forecasting other disability payments informed your costings and assessment of the pension-age disability payment?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Budget Scrutiny 2024-25

Meeting date: 11 January 2024

Paul O'Kane

I am interested in understanding more about the costings for new policies that will come in this year. However, my first question is about the impact that delays to new benefits have on forecasting. For example, the delay of carer support payment from spring to autumn has been widely discussed and we have spoken about it in the committee. To what extent does that have an impact on the forecast?

10:00