The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 981 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Paul O'Kane
Your last point is interesting, because in the earlier session, the point was raised that although we have data sets and quite a lot of information, and people are very often good at reporting—although not perfect, as Pauline Nolan suggests—if everybody reports but there is a lack of action, the implementation gap then becomes the issue.
This is maybe a broader question about data for everyone, but do you agree that there is a lot of data, but the challenge is the deep-dive interrogation of that data?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Paul O'Kane
Good morning. I asked the previous panel of witnesses how we might extend pay gap reporting, particularly in terms of ethnicity and disability, and I am particularly interested in getting a broader view on that.
With regard to older people and people who are ageing in work, there is often something of a disability gap that can be tested and might develop over time. It would be good to get a sense of whether you think that we should extend the reporting to consider disability within that pay gap. It would also be interesting to hear witnesses’ views on ethnicity in that regard. Pauline Nolan, could you start?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Paul O'Kane
I started by asking about data. I know that CRER has also commented on the need for social security data in order to understand the poverty gap if folk are not in work. Do you think that we need a broader suite of data in that space?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 March 2025
Paul O'Kane
Good morning, cabinet secretary. I have a brief question to help me understand the picture on carers support payment now that case transfers are coming to an end.
At the UK level, the Chancellor of the Exchequer moved the earnings limit for the first time since 1976 and increased eligibility. The Scottish Government has replicated that approach. What reflection does the cabinet secretary have on the potential for further expansion of the earnings limit? Does she intend to pursue that within the devolved context or would that depend on the interrelationship with any further changes that the UK Government might decide to make to carers allowance? What discussions has she had about that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Paul O'Kane
Martin, is it your sense that it would be useful to have more detail on what is expected of local authorities in terms of what they offer currently? One of the challenges in my work is that easy-read communication is not offered as standard across many agencies. If somebody walked into Aberdeenshire Council, would they be able to get that quickly, or would it take some time? Are those the areas that you have identified where we need a bit more standardisation?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Paul O'Kane
That was helpful. Andrew, do you want to come in?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Paul O'Kane
Some cross-cutting work has been done—for example, the committee has looked at issues around interpretation services in relation to refugee asylum seekers—but there is a wider conversation to be had about all that, and it is useful to bring that to the fore.
My final question is about resources. We cannot get away from the fact that implementing the public sector equality duty takes money, staffing and people. Reference has already been made to the challenging backdrop against which much of this work is being done. Do you agree with the assessment of many public bodies that have responded that resourcing will be a huge issue that will have to be looked at directly, along with public sector organisations, to understand what the existing capacity might be and what will be required in the future?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Paul O'Kane
Nicky, do you want to add anything?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Paul O'Kane
You did, indeed. We heard that. Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Paul O'Kane
It is important to include in an audit framework people who have lived experience of requiring such communication. I am sure that they are involved at some point in the process, but perhaps they could be involved in a more formal way to say whether something is working and why.