The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 986 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Paul O'Kane
I want to return to the implementation and resourcing of the current strategy. I appreciate that, in previous answers, there has been a call for more funding for research, which is important. The creating hope together strategy has anticipated that some of the £2.8 million will be used to fund research. Can you expand on the details of where that money or additional resource could be spent, not just in research but on other elements that you think would be helpful to complement that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Paul O'Kane
That is interesting. The discussion that we had last week while taking evidence from third sector and voluntary sector organisations came from very much the same space in talking about sufficiency of funding and longer-term funding. We had interesting contributions about being able to test changes, try things and support people in a more informal way. That perhaps comes back to Dr Marzetti’s point about people who use informal spaces such as men’s sheds or some of the preventative organisations feeling that they can share more openly. Do you recognise the concern that there is not sufficient long-term funding to allow such organisations to try things?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Paul O'Kane
We have heard evidence about challenges with the sustainability of funding to allow the third sector to try things out or make changes and to test what works. It would be interesting to get a sense of that. The amount of money is important, but so is having confidence in funding.
On the NHS side, it was interesting to hear Dr Smith talking about how additional resources or support are used for direct work but are then removed, leaving a gap. Do you feel that we often reinvent the wheel? Do things come in cycles, disappear and then come back? That could be problematic for planning.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Paul O'Kane
Dr Smith, do you want to add anything from an acute care point of view?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2024
Paul O'Kane
To go back to that resourcing piece and how personnel are supported, I suppose that your view is that there could be a shift in workload and the terms and conditions that are associated with that.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2024
Paul O'Kane
Tied to this is the stress that an appellant feels about the process. Going through the process can be a stressful time, particularly when it comes to waiting and to the collection of information. What more could we do to make the experience less stressful?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2024
Paul O'Kane
So you think that perhaps more flexibility in the system would allow those agencies to consider how they participate. I imagine that, often, they will be supporting a volume of cases.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2024
Paul O'Kane
The use of technology to make the system less stressful and quicker is of interest. In another committee, I made a visit to the SCTS to discuss the use of technology across the service. Could we do more on that front, with a bit of investment in testing change through technology? For example, could the recording of notes using artificial intelligence and the use of more virtual hearings—which you mentioned—be helpful?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2024
Paul O'Kane
My questions build on the theme of delay to appeals. We have had a discussion about resourcing and about support for the process. Are there other barriers that cause delays, and what action is being taken to deal with those? Previous answers have touched on some of that, but perhaps Ms Devlin could talk about other barriers in the appeals process.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2024
Paul O'Kane
Are there challenges with the collation of the information? I know that there have been issues with the timescale for information collation in some other parts of the application process. Do you feel that that is not an issue?