The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 986 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Paul O'Kane
I will play devil’s advocate for a moment. You have listed—quite rightly—some of the challenges that we face: progress on the LDAN bill is being stalled, there will be no human rights bill in this session of Parliament, the £10 million of changing places funding looks like it will not go ahead, and non-residential care charges will not be abolished by the end of this session. The Government has made those decisions. You, I and others who have an interest as parliamentarians have not yet been able to change those decisions, although we continue to try, as do campaign groups and a range of stakeholders.
If we, as democratic politicians elected to hold the Government to account, have not been able to change minds at this stage, how would a commissioner do that? What would a commissioner add? There have been situations in which other commissioners have been ignored by Governments of all stripes.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Paul O'Kane
Would you be concerned that one commissioner would have too much to look at? Say that we had a disability commissioner who covered absolutely everything, including, I suppose, neurodiversity. I do not think that that has been fully defined yet—there is certainly disagreement on some of the definitions that were contained in the consultation on the LDAN bill. Are you concerned that that subject matter is too vast?
Also, people want a commissioner to do two things: to advocate, as you have quite rightly talked about; and to investigate. A lot of issues that came up during the LDAN bill consultation process were to do with breaches of people’s human rights, not least of which were the use of seclusion and restraint in schools. Many of those issues are faced by disabled people and their families in particular. Is dealing with all that too vast a prospect for one commissioner?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2024
Paul O'Kane
I am talking about the interaction with the public sector and service provision. For example, what would make the process of reporting on your service level agreements easier?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2024
Paul O'Kane
Are there sufficient structures to have those sorts of conversations, or do we need to look at how all that is communicated?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2024
Paul O'Kane
I want to draw together a lot of what we have been talking about this morning. We have had a wide-ranging discussion, but we have focused particularly on finance, which is only right when we are talking about funding. We have been talking about fair funding principles for some time now, and we have been talking about parity of esteem and respect in the sector for a long, long time.
Euan, you mentioned the fact that other mechanisms could be looked at to embed a fairer funding principle and that they would not necessarily cost money, because it would be all about changing the structures. What are some of those mechanisms, and how might we move forward on those issues?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2024
Paul O'Kane
Does anyone else want to comment on that broad point?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2024
Paul O'Kane
Good morning. I will try to pull together some of our discussions by asking about parity of esteem and how the sector feels about the budget allocations and negotiations.
First, I am particularly interested in what mechanisms we could introduce to provide third sector organisations with more stability. We have touched on three-year funding and the benefit of knowing what is coming. In the context of the demand for your services and the services of other partners in the public sector, what sort of mechanisms, in line with fair funding principles, would you like to be introduced?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2024
Paul O'Kane
In relation to funding, whether from the Scottish Government or the local authority, do you feel that the pressures as a result of need are being managed? You talked about waiting lists—I assume that those are for voluntary sector services that provide care, support and those sorts of things. Do you feel that that is factored into your budget conversations?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2024
Paul O'Kane
I was trying to set the scene, because we are interested in how the sector feels about its relationships. Do you feel that you are an equal partner? There is partnership and there is true partnership—some partnerships are perhaps better than others. Is there still a sense in the sector that it is often looked at as the cheaper alternative to public services? We have certainly heard that people feel that way.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2024
Paul O'Kane
Can I bring Ran Majumder in to give us the urban context? Shetland is a helpful example of where things are working well and where the challenges are. Ran, do you see some of the same things in the Edinburgh context?