The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 912 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Katy Clark
You are open to looking at that. That is great.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Katy Clark
As we all know, people tend to work to deadlines. When we ask for specific regulations or a specific document, the Parliament is often given the explanation that that information is not ready yet. That is a cultural issue in relation to how we organise ourselves. Would it be possible, in some situations, to have stricter requirements on draft regulations being available at an earlier stage?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Katy Clark
Uprating of benefits and changes to the levels of fines are defined and narrow issues for the Parliament to consider, and they often relate to increases in the cost of living and people’s wages. However, it would have been possible to put a great deal more detail in the Fireworks and Pyrotechnic Articles (Scotland) Act 2022, for example, and in some criminal justice legislation, but the Scottish Government chose not to go down that path. That approach can make it difficult for the Criminal Justice Committee to ascertain exactly what the Government is proposing, so we have to consult and scrutinise on the basis of what we think the Government is likely to do.
Often, the Government does what we guess it will do and what we think is most likely. However, do you agree that the whole point of scrutiny is to scrutinise specific proposals and that currently, in many situations, such detail is not in primary legislation? In those situations, should there be scope for an enhanced scrutiny process for secondary legislation?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Katy Clark
The evidence that you have just given on time limits is highly concerning. The committee would very much appreciate it if you wished to provide more information on that. As you say, it would be interesting to get the Crown’s perspective on those issues.
On the bill that we have before us today, you have given very clear evidence that you can see many scenarios in which national jurisdiction might be helpful and appropriate, but you also expressed considerable concern. The provision would apply to a range of different types of cases. It would apply to solemn and summary cases, and to cases that are at different stages, perhaps where there has already been a lengthy trial, where someone is appearing from custody or where a particular sheriff or judge has a great deal of knowledge of a case or an accused.
Could there be more detail in the bill on the kind of criteria that would need to be used in relation to national jurisdiction, or should there be a requirement for more detail in, for example, a practice note or in the rules of court? Is that something that you have given any consideration to or that you could assist the committee with? If we agree to the principle of national jurisdiction, do the criteria, safeguards and protections need to be fleshed out more?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Katy Clark
Thank you.
I will ask a question on part 2 of the bill, which sets out a framework for a system of domestic homicide and suicide reviews. Have you looked at those provisions? Do you have any views that you would be able to share with the committee?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Katy Clark
Thank you.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Katy Clark
If Mike Hedges or Jonathan Jones do not want to come in on that, I will move on.
Another issue is the supporting documentation that comes with statutory instruments. As you know, there is often an explanatory note as well as a policy note. In your experience, is the information that is provided accurate? Moreover, is it sufficient, particularly in respect of delegated legislation that is made under a framework bill?
That is a question for the witnesses in the room. I do not know whether Finlay Carson would like to come in on that first.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Katy Clark
Kenneth Gibson, would you like to respond?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Katy Clark
Jonathan Jones, from a Westminster perspective, is there a case for being able to amend secondary legislation? At the moment, we are put in a position in which we have to take it or leave it—parliamentarians are not able to amend SSIs. Do you have a view on that? What would the issues be?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Katy Clark
Does Mike Hedges have a view on that?