The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 894 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Katy Clark
I do not know a lot of the detail of how the process operates in Wales or the role of families there. Have you been able to look at that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Katy Clark
I presume that your view is that the report and other information should be shared with families and that there should be disclosure with families. Is that fair?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Katy Clark
You think that the report should be redacted in some way to try to ensure that it is not possible to ascertain who it is about. Is that a fair summary?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Katy Clark
Is it your understanding that, when the defence objects, it would normally be the case that evidence would be given in person, and that it would not be the default for evidence to be given virtually?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Katy Clark
Yes, but we must look at what is in the bill and the black letter of the law. That is not clear in the bill, is it?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Katy Clark
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Katy Clark
My questions, which are perhaps best directed at Laura Buchan or Emma Forbes, focus on the right to a fair trial and on ensuring that we prevent miscarriages of justice.
I believe that some of the early pilots required agreement from both sides for virtual attendance, but I do not believe that that is what is being proposed here. We know that a lot of professional evidence is disputed, and we know, too, that the courts have not always accepted police evidence. We really should have a system in which, for example, early pleas are encouraged and cases are fully prepared to enable that to happen. Moreover, if witnesses are expected to go through a trial to which there is a guilty outcome, the inconvenience to them of having to travel what are sometimes very considerable distances should be taken into account in sentencing. Do you see advantages in, say, police giving evidence in person to ensure that that evidence is tested? In what kinds of scenarios do you think that evidence should be given in person?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Katy Clark
What test will be applied by the court when the defence objects?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Katy Clark
I presume that the test that the court would apply would be whether it would be in the interests of justice for a witness to give evidence remotely or in court.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Katy Clark
There is no further test. Are there no other criteria set out in the bill?