Seòmar agus comataidhean

I do not expect you to give a legal answer.

An example that was used by Louise Hill was the fact that children are not being allowed to give evidence remotely or virtually. Should there be a legal mechanism to allow the commissioner to be involved in such a case, so that there could be intervention? Would that kind of area need to be explored to make the commissioner’s role effective?

I am grateful for those answers. Thank you.

I can now—sorry, convener. My screen said that the host was not allowing me to unmute myself. Apologies for that.

Graham O’Neill spoke powerfully about the need to strengthen the powers of the commissioner, and Louise Hill spoke about the implementation gap. That is a powerful criticism not just of the Scottish Government and the justice system but of Parliament itself in its scrutiny role.

I am interested in why we would believe that another voice of criticism, perhaps focusing on some of the failures of the system, is unlikely to be effective unless it has the power to intervene in cases. The panel may all have a view on that. Graham O’Neill has already said that that power should be there. Is that the view of everyone on the panel?

Okay. Thank you.

Is that your concern?

Paul, do you have any thoughts on that?

You have made that point clear.

That is helpful. Paul, in your submission you state that the voluntary sector’s contribution to the vision for a wellbeing economy remains “largely unacknowledged”. Will you explain that in more detail?

Alison Davis might want to come in, although I know that we are short of time.