The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 912 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2024
Katy Clark
Cabinet secretary, why is the programme budget increasing when the programme business case suggested that it would be falling by this stage? Is the programme still expected to finish at the end of 2025, as is stated in the business case?
10:30Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2024
Katy Clark
The cabinet secretary may be able to keep the committee advised on that. Does her colleague want to add anything?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Katy Clark
Yes. I am sorry—I could not unmute myself to come in.
Can I bring in Cheryl Thomas on that issue? Parliament is being asked to make some substantial changes to the court processes for rape cases, but some of us genuinely believe that a better approach might be to look at the independent legal representation issue. Can Professor Thomas can give any information on that from her experience? Is that something that she has any knowledge about?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Katy Clark
I thank the witnesses for the clarity in their responses so far, which have made clear that their concerns are not about specialisation or the concept of a specialist court but about the specific proposals in the bill.
One issue that the committee has to consider is whether the bill is acceptable as it stands or whether it is amendable. Sheila Webster has spoken about the experiences of witnesses.
Do the panel members have a view on whether amendments could be made that could address some of the genuine concerns about the experiences of trial witnesses? We are getting evidence that, even with some of the new practices that have already been brought in, such as taking evidence on commission, the experience of complainers is simply not acceptable throughout the process of the criminal justice system and not just in court.
I invite Tony Lenehan to come in on that, although the convener could perhaps bring in others who wish to respond. I am not in the committee room, so it is difficult to catch people’s eye to see if they wish to contribute.
11:30Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Katy Clark
Convener, I do not know whether you want to bring in any of the other witnesses.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Katy Clark
Is it fair to say, from what the witnesses have said so far, that different research has come to quite different conclusions in relation to rape myths? Is there any difference between mock jury research and research into real jurors? Can any witnesses expand on that point or give any other explanation as to why different research has come to different conclusions? We have heard a lot about the Scottish jury research, which involved mock jurors. We have also heard that the cases were quite short, and that the amount of time spent by the jurors on the case was quite short compared with a real case. Also, there were only two sets of facts, so there might have been limitations there.
Do you think that it is wise for politicians to base decisions in relation to the abolition of jury trials on research when there is so little clarity? There might be other reasons to get rid of jurors in rape cases—reasons to do with the experiences of witnesses, survivors and complainers, for instance—but would it be unwise to base conclusions around rape myths when the evidence seems so unclear?
Perhaps Cheryl Thomas would want to respond—although the convener will be better placed to see whether the witness wishes to answer.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Katy Clark
No.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Katy Clark
Professor Chalmers kindly attended an event that I held in the Parliament last year on independent legal representation. The witnesses will be aware that a number of other jurisdictions have far more extensive independent legal representation for rape victims or complainers through the trial process and outside the courtroom. That happens in systems that are in many ways similar to the Scottish system. Have the academics looked at that? Do they have views on it?
On independent legal representation, is there scope to look beyond what is proposed in the bill that we are scrutinising? The committee is extremely concerned—it is fair to say that the concern is cross-party—about low conviction rates and, just as importantly, about the experience of rape complainers who have given evidence repeatedly over many years about the retraumatising effect of the criminal justice system and how that system lets them down.
It is often said that the role of the criminal justice system is not to deliver for the complainer—it is a process by the state. We are keen to explore how we improve the experience for complainers. Would independent legal representation and advice provide one way to empower complainers through the process and improve their experience? As Professor Chalmers has looked at the issue previously, I will bring him in first.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Katy Clark
Perhaps Vanessa Munro might have a different perspective.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Katy Clark
Thank you.