The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1065 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Katy Clark
To clarify, is the Scottish Government in favour of decriminalising women who are involved in the sex trade?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Katy Clark
My final question is about sex offenders. There has been an awful lot of debate about programmes for such offenders and whether there are effective ways to rehabilitate them. Can you say anything about how much resource the Scottish Prison Service puts into such work, the effectiveness of that work, and the budget implications should there be attempts to expand it?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Katy Clark
Are you saying that you do not support decriminalisation?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Katy Clark
At the moment, you are willing to accept the status quo, which is that the perpetrators, most of whom are men, behave in a lawful manner and that the women who are involved in the sex trade are criminalised. Is that acceptable?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Katy Clark
Yes—exactly.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Katy Clark
For reasons of time I will ask about just one aspect of the bill. The new offence that we have just been discussing is crafted to address an identified problem and is designed to have a deterrent effect. We knew that there were going to be FOI requests about how the Scottish Government had dealt with Covid, and that is the particular scenario that has led to the proposed provision.
Do you have experience of working with the criminal offences in the 2002 act? The provision in the bill has been crafted in the same way. Do you have any practical experience of dealing with scenarios that have led to prosecutions under the act? That existing provision is rarely used.
10:30Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Katy Clark
My question is about the proposed criminal offence. The threshold for a criminal case is “beyond reasonable doubt”. The new offence is perceived to be about closing a loophole. It would have to be shown in court that someone was intending to avoid the law by destroying information. Do you think that the new offence would be used often, given that the criminal charges that already exist are rarely used?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Katy Clark
I think that we have run out of time. Thank you.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Katy Clark
The proposal for FOI officers to have a statutory basis has come from FOI officers over an extended period, long before I got involved in the issue. FOI officers in many organisations have said that they are having difficulties in getting their organisations to comply with the legislation. I appreciate that that does not sound as if it is at all the case in Glasgow, but it is the case in other organisations. FOI officers—who are often also data protection officers, particularly in smaller organisations—are saying that having a similar statutory basis to that for data protection would give them the authority in an organisation to insist that the law was complied with. Does that make sense to you?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Katy Clark
I have a couple of questions for Kenneth Meechan. It is good to hear that the existing legislation is working well for a large organisation such as Glasgow City Council. The policy intention behind the bill is not to add costs to such organisations or to move away from the structure of the existing legislation, known as FOISA, which uses a designation approach—I think that you referred to it as a list process—but to build on that, based on 20 years of feedback from organisations, the public and information commissioners.
One of the suggested changes is a move towards proactive publication. Would the code of practice that the Scottish Information Commissioner is to issue assist local authorities such as yours in knowing what must be proactively published? We know from evidence that technology has the ability to drive down publication costs.