The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1221 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Katy Clark
I will ask one question if that is okay.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Katy Clark
With regard to the new designations and the costs and benefits, there is, as Ben Worthy has said, a wide range of views on the cost of FOI, but there are also significant benefits to the public purse of FOI as a result of driving transparency, particularly for big organisations. As Kevin Dunion has said, the bill has changed significantly during the consultation process. Lots of people would have liked the bill to immediately designate everybody who delivers public services in Scotland, but, in reality, that is not what the bill will do. What it aims to do is drive new designations, particularly through the creation of a role for the Parliament.
Can you say something to make it real to people what the bill might mean for those sectors or bodies that you believe should be prioritised for designation? What is your advice to the Parliament on what the priority should be?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Katy Clark
Thank you. I appreciate that you are down south.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Katy Clark
The rail sector is heavily unionised, and there has been litigation to try to extend FOI into it. As you have said, ScotRail is now in public ownership and therefore has to comply with FOI. However, there are many sectors that perhaps do not get as much attention and where we have massive public contracts, with many millions of pounds going to multinationals to provide public services. From your experience, what benefits might there be in extending the regime to cover some of those large contracts with multinationals?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Katy Clark
There have been campaigns over a number of Scottish Parliament sessions to update and extend freedom of information provisions in Scotland. As has been mentioned, the committee undertook an inquiry, took evidence and produced a report with recommendations in the previous session. The bill is partly a response to that: it includes some of those recommendations, or it is an attempt to deliver on some of them—and, indeed, on recommendations that have been made by successive Information Commissioners, who all support the bill.
A lot of the submissions discuss public trust and the popularity of robust freedom of information laws. What is your opinion of the likely views of campaigners, in particular, but also of the views of the wider public should there be a failure to take action to address some of the issues that have been raised time and again over a number of sessions?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Katy Clark
That is helpful. Do you support the repeal of that legislation?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Katy Clark
Apologies. Perhaps it was Liliana Torres Jiménez.
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Katy Clark
Emma Forbes, you referred to 46 prosecutions. Is that correct? Would you perhaps clarify exactly what that number refers to?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Katy Clark
What was the nature of those charges?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Katy Clark
I am grateful for that clarification. I was going to ask you about that legislation, because this bill provides for the repeal of the offences that are set out in that section of the 1982 act, which criminalises street prostitution.
You have given us an indication of the number of charges that have been brought. Can you say a little bit more about the use of that offence in recent years and whether you support its repeal?