The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 912 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Katy Clark
Is that the number who are in the system?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Katy Clark
Are you giving an undertaking that there will be an increase in the number of times that a complainer or victim is asked whether they would like to be registered for the VNS?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Katy Clark
So the main reason for that decision is the fact that the outcome of the review was a recommendation not to go down that path, and your focus is on implementing the review.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Katy Clark
I want to pick up on the earlier discussion about take-up and people registering for the victim notification scheme. I appreciate your point that the creation of the new team will enable people to be asked more often, but has any work been done on or thought been given to how people are asked whether they wish to opt in? I presume that, at the moment, they are simply asked, “Would you like to opt into the victim notification scheme?” However, asking them in a different way might lead to a different outcome.
Clearly, from what you have said, the hope is that, if people are asked more often, more of them might opt in, but if they are asked, “Would you like to be included in the scheme or not?” and they have to say, “No, I don’t” or “Yes, I do”, will that work? Is that something that you have explored? If one of the policy priorities of the scheme is to improve uptake, when we come to scrutinise whether the scheme is working, one of the main criteria that we will be looking at is whether it has increased the number of people who are getting information. Have you or your officials looked at or given any thought to that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Katy Clark
Would it be possible for the committee to have a copy of that pack so that we have a better understanding of the process that complainers have to go through at the moment?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Katy Clark
I just want to understand. That is the number of people who are registered on the system, but we know that, in recent years, the number of victims who have been notified is very low. Has there been a significant increase in the number of victims who have registered in recent months?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Katy Clark
Thank you. The concern is that only a small number—a small percentage—of victims have been notified in the past, and many victims would like to be notified but have not registered, for whatever reason. It is often because they are asked only at the beginning of the case, when it is not necessarily something that they are focusing on.
Can you explain that figure of 3,057 and whether it is significantly different? I understand that you do not have the figures in front of you, but is there any reason to believe that there is going to be a significant increase in the number of victims who get notified when there is a significant change in future?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Katy Clark
No; I am asking about the figure that you have just given us.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Katy Clark
I am trying to understand the figures that you have provided today and how they relate to information that we were provided with previously. You said that 3,075 individuals are on the victim notification scheme. Is that correct? Reference was also made to 25 per cent of victims being on the scheme. I appreciate that there are three schemes, and there was also reference to other figures. You can correct me, but that is the information that you have given today.
I am trying to understand the gap between the number of those who are registered on the system—I appreciate what has been said about trying to increase that number—and the number of those who are notified. According to the figures that we were given previously, 477 offenders were released during the early releases in the summer, but only five victims were notified. That seems to be the pattern. The number of victims who get information on release seems to be very low. I know that you listed all the different types of notification that can be given and the different organisations that are involved, but could you confirm that, at the moment, notification levels are low? Could you outline what they are, either today or in correspondence after the meeting, so that we can understand the nature of the problem that we are trying to address?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Katy Clark
It came from your colleague Lucy Smith.