The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1669 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
Section 5 of the bill seeks to broaden the PIRC’s functions. Your organisation has commented that that
“would significantly impact on PIRC’s budget and ability to operate.”
I note, too, that in respect of section 12, your organisation has commented that, as a result of the right to call in complaints, the PIRC might
“become overwhelmed”
and that there would be
“further resource implications”.
We have heard from other witnesses, including the Scottish Police Federation, that the financial cost of the bill has already risen according to the financial memorandum, and that they believe that the cost will be higher still. What is the PIRC’s latest official assessment of the cost?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
The language used by the inspector was that freezing cases was “open to abuse” and was being used inappropriately “for no discernible reason”. The report also states that CAAPD
“had developed an unhealthy and misguided approach to managing its targets”,
and that it
“masked the reality of what was happening”
and misled everyone from the general public right through to the Lord Advocate.
I understand that you have put that right. Given that report, and the fact that we have heard so much evidence from witnesses about a lack of trust, do you believe that the public can trust the data that is coming from CAAPD?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
There was another case subsequent to that one in which a female police officer from the Moray area made multiple internal allegations of an employment nature and a criminal nature, which were kept in-house and withheld from the relevant authorities. That officer has also been publicly critical of the PIRC. Although the PIRC unblocked that case by identifying and investigating those allegations, which, up until then, had not been done, the subsequent report into the entire case has not been published. Can you explain why that would be?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
I would just be interested to know whether, given the increased use of diversion from prosecution within the broader criminal justice system, we are seeing that mirrored in the cases that you deal with.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
That leads me on to my next question. We have heard evidence of cases in which complainers, whether members of the public or police officers, believed that what they had imparted had subsequently been shared with CAAPD—as is right and proper—but that had not been the case. Are you confident that the situation has improved, now that a lot more scrutiny is being applied to those particular cases and the wider issues, or can the legislation itself be improved to ensure that that does happen?
12:00Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
One of the non-legislative recommendations of the Angiolini review was that the PIRC should investigate all on-duty allegations of assault made against police officers. That has been happening since October 2021 and it has had a significant impact on your workload. Can you quantify what that has meant for the organisation in typical numbers of cases or as a proportion of your workload?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
I would like to return to the point that was raised by Rona Mackay on the HM Inspectorate of Prosecution in Scotland report from 2021, which talked about CAAPD freezing cases, and you have already referred to that. The detail of that report is actually quite shocking. It said that cases were frozen while you were gathering or requesting additional work to be done. In some cases, I think that it reset the clock rather than just paused it.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
That answer illustrates neatly how complicated the landscape is for a member of the public. If that were represented as a flow chart, it would be quite confusing.
Communication with complainers—whether they are police officers or members of the public—is vital. To go back to the HMIPS report, it said that communication from CAAPD was unsatisfactory in four in 10 of the 80 cases that were looked at. The report contains quite detailed accounts, some of which are pretty shocking, to be frank.
You came into your post when that report was produced. What can you say about the quality of communication from CAAPD now?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
I do not want to put words in your mouth, but, as the PIRC, are you now confident that, if similar cases arose now or in the future, Police Scotland would treat them properly?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
That is interesting.