The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1669 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2024
Russell Findlay
Sure.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
In that case, you would have shared your information with someone else in the Crown Office.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
However, if that does happen, it will come with a price tag, and we do not know what that will be.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
As my colleague Sharon Dowey said, delays cause huge problems for complainers and, indeed, police officers. We heard from one officer whose case took 900 days from start to finish before he was cleared, and he also spoke of colleagues taking their own lives while they were the subject of complaints. When CAAPD has become aware of cases in which officers have died of suicide, have you liaised and shared that information with Crown Office colleagues?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
The Crown Office website has, I think, been updated fairly recently to acknowledge the fact that some people might have a fundamental lack of trust—or confidence—in their complaint being properly advanced by Police Scotland. It is great that that is out there, but the fact is that you would ordinarily direct the same people back to Police Scotland.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
And that decision is based entirely on the information that you get back being accurate.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
Does that refer to the error in this order?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
I presume that you tell complainers when a final decision has been made. Is that a matter of routine?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
Yes, I do—thank you, convener.
The LCMs relate to the UK Criminal Justice Bill. There is reference in the submission from the Scottish Government to a House of Commons debate on 11 January this year, and it says that the Scottish Government rejected clauses 11 and 12 of the UK bill, which relate to causing people to commit online self-harm. There have been tragic cases of young people harming themselves and even taking their own lives, having been coerced and manipulated by others to do so.
I see from Hansard that the application of the offence in Scotland was rejected by the Scottish Government. Given the importance of a consistent UK-wide approach to some of the other measures that have been adopted, as the Scottish Government’s submission notes, can you explain the thinking behind that particular decision?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
In 2018, your predecessor, Kate Frame, raised concerns about the case of an innocent man who had been wrongly locked up after the police failed to check his identity. Police Scotland recorded that as a quality-of-service complaint. In a letter to the committee before my time here, Ms Frame said that Police Scotland’s handling of the case
“suggests an endeavour to keep matters hidden.”
Other witnesses have told us about Police Scotland keeping serious alleged crimes in-house and not sharing them with the Crown or the PIRC. Many of those same people—whose evidence I am sure that you will have heard—have absolutely no faith in the PIRC in respect of their complaints. Since those days, can Police Scotland now be trusted to fully disclose such cases as they should?