The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1669 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Russell Findlay
I see. I had misunderstood, so I am glad that I clarified that. So, for 35 per cent of those who are off at a typical moment, their absence relates to mental health.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Russell Findlay
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Russell Findlay
I have a couple of questions that the committee might be interested in asking. I have been assisting one of the female complainers in this long drawn-out saga, and there are several questions and concerns, so I think that it is useful to give a quick synopsis of the matter.
This is the first fitness for judicial office tribunal in Scotland, having been legislated for in 2014. In March 2021, the tribunal found the individual’s behaviour to be inappropriate. However, the findings of that tribunal were quashed on appeal, because the tribunal did not take some other evidence into account. A second tribunal was held, which ruled that he had committed serious improper conduct, which is a matter of public record.
All of that took five years to conclude. In that time, the individual was suspended on full pay, which amounts to not far off £1 million in pay. As far as I understand it, the public might also be required to pay the legal costs of the individual. I have asked the Scottish Government how much that will be, and I am waiting for an answer.
The first question is whether it is proper in such circumstances for the public purse to meet the cost of a judicial office-holder’s legal fees.
The second question is about the time that it took for what appears to be a relatively straightforward process that we might imagine happening in any other walk of life. Why did that take the best part of five years? On the basis of it being a brand-new tribunal and a brand-new process, is the Scottish Government concerned that the case will be typical, or is it confident that we will not see a repeat of a five-year process?
12:00The third point is a possible question, but it is more a general point. The female complainer in that particular case was led to believe that she did not have an automatic right to know the outcome of the proceedings and, indeed, that it would not automatically be a matter of public record. That is at the discretion or behest of the First Minister of the day.
In March, I wrote to the First Minister at the time, Humza Yousaf, to suggest that the issue might be looked at. I would not necessarily call it a loophole, but the issue is whether there should be some form of appraisal of whether, in such a tribunal—as rare as they might be—the default position should be that complainers are informed proactively and unconditionally, and that the wider public are also informed.
Those are my thoughts.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Russell Findlay
So crime victims will see in the news that there will be a mass release of 550 prisoners who are serving sentences of under four years. Those prisoners will include people who have committed sexual crimes and acts of violence.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Russell Findlay
Right. They might have committed sexual crimes in the past, but the index offence would not include sex offences.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Russell Findlay
They might come to you, but they cannot possibly know whether their offender is being considered for release until they engage with you and you go through the process with them.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Russell Findlay
According to Lynsey Smith, a list of the offenders who could potentially be released has been circulated to Police Scotland and the Risk Management Authority. Could the Government be more proactive and share that information with your organisations?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Russell Findlay
Does it not concern you slightly that Unison is saying that, if the duty of candour applies in that respect, all those civilian staff—6,000 of them—will be a regulated workforce in the same way as police officers are, and they will expect a pay rise?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Russell Findlay
We have a strange situation in which the bill attempts to give the PIRC new powers, but the PIRC has told us that it is not able to have some powers for financial reasons, or that it does not want other powers. In respect of section 5 of the bill it said that “further detail is critical” and it strenuously opposes being given one particular function, which is the holding of senior officer gross misconduct cases. It says that it does not have the skills or resources to hold such cases, that there would be a lack of oversight of the PIRC, and even that such cases would impact on the PIRC’s ability to operate. Have you listened to those concerns and are you doing anything to address them in the legislation?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Russell Findlay
But does it not worry you to hear what Unison has said?