The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1225 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
David Torrance asked you about the website, and I believe that he said that it needs to be improved. I went into Google and I put in “NHS GGC complex mesh”. The hyperlink came up and it said, “It seems that we can’t find what you are looking for.”
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Forgive me, minister, but are you saying that GDPR is an issue when it comes to referrals?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
What is the Scottish Government’s position on credentialling?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Do you envisage credentialling moving into general practice?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Can you write to us with a response?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Okay.
Obviously, a key member is missing from the clinic; it has no urogynaecology specialist, which is causing a bit of angst among a lot of women who have written to me. There has been a lot of talk about issues of continence in women—and I just want to say very quickly that it is a real shame that women do not go to their GPs about such issues, as there is a lot that we can do. It is certainly not wasting my time for women to come and see me about those issues but, sadly, that is what a lot of them feel, I think. When do you envisage such a specialist being in place in the clinic?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Minister, when was the bill passed?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
You are, of course, correct, but when we are thinking about a reimbursement scheme and talking about pathways for women who have suffered and are struggling, everything goes hand in hand. I was under the impression that the Government was looking at what to do with women who are struggling, who are in pain and who were unable to get the help that they required during the passage of the bill. That is why my question was framed in that manner.
My final question is also on the referral pathway. Is it possible for a GP to directly refer into that pathway?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
We heard from a number of people that general practitioners are making direct referrals and that the pathway is a secondary care referral pathway. If the people who are coming to the committee are not being absolutely explicit, how can we expect other people to know what the pathway is and the way to follow it?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Carol Mochan asked about GPs accessing information. I often do not know what surgery a patient who is in front of me has had and patients often do not know the details of the surgery that they have had. You can send me all the information you want to send about what women who have mesh might experience, but, if I do not know that a person has had mesh implanted, how can I put two and two together?