The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1135 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Good morning. I have a quick question. Forbes, in May 2023, you said:
“When it comes to racism, it is no longer good enough to not be racist. Scottish sport must become anti-racist.”
What exactly did you mean by that statement and what have you done in the two years since you made it?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Thank you. I declare an interest as a practicing NHS general practitioner.
I would like to go back to amendment 50E and talk a little bit more about the essential care supporter and having somebody named as such. As you rightly said, during the pandemic, there was an absolute failure when it came to Scottish care homes. Anne’s law is fundamental, and we all agree with it—we have all said, for many years, that we want it to come in.
My feeling is that a named essential care supporter will strengthen the rights of the individual. The idea, which I believe in, is that that person will be a trusted source for the care home resident, who might not be able to speak for themselves, although, if they can, their voice will, surely, be heard louder than that of the essential care supporter. Is that the case? Do you think that the role of essential care supporter is a vital one to have?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
I would like further clarification as to why we are using the GDP deflator. I know that it has been used historically, but why has that particular measure been used as opposed to any other measure? I put that question to the minister twice, but the actual reason for using the GDP deflator as opposed to any other economic outcome measure was not clear. Although I agree that it has been used historically, the question why still stands.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Will Jackie Baillie take an intervention?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Does Katy Clark acknowledge that private care homes are paid less to provide a service than the local authority pays its own providers, that they therefore represent a significant saving to the public purse, and that they are not the very evil entities that, it seems, they are portrayed as?
If a company provides an element of public service but also does other things, other companies could use a freedom of information request to look into the detail of that company—which could include very sensitive information—thereby gaining an advantage not just in the public space but in real private services. Does that not risk our losing private care homes, which save the public money?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
I find it odd that the minister talks about wrecking when she has removed section 1 of the bill and has lodged multiple amendments that, in effect, wreck the original bill that the Scottish Government laid.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
I declare my interest as a practising NHS GP.
A GDP deflator, which has been used previously, was used as the measure, and I note that, in the past, the Scottish Government has put in more money than the GDP deflator said was owed. Is the uplift of 2.37 per cent sufficient for personal care to continue as it is? Why are we using the GDP deflator as opposed to other economic measures?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
I wonder whether the minister could clarify a couple of things in amendment 56. In a legal sense, “a person” can refer to individuals, businesses, organisations, but the definition is potentially limited by the provisions in the legislation. Are there such limitations in the legislation? Are there any restrictions in the full legislation or definitions that govern the power?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
It is very important that we create a complaints system. The Care Inspectorate seems to be a good route for that to happen and to improve local standards. However, I heard what the minister said, and I seek to withdraw amendment 142.
Amendment 142, by agreement, withdrawn.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
The role of the national chief social work adviser sits in the Scottish Government at deputy director level. The minister is looking to create a national social work agency around the national chief social work adviser with that person at deputy director level, which undermines the person who does that role. For equality among our healthcare professionals, especially considering how vital social workers are to the care sector, we need the post to be at director level to enable the postholder to access all meetings and to sit at a level commensurate with other professions. I worry that all this work is being put on somebody who really should be sitting at director level, as is the case with similar roles.