The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1267 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee 5 March 2024
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
We can pick that up with the panel, too. Chris Provan, your submission says:
“RCGP Scotland agrees with the purpose of the proposed Bill”.
So, I ask you the same question: do you agree with the bill as it is worded?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee 5 March 2024
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Just for the record, let us say that I want to go and protest outside an NHS Tayside building about the Professor Eljamel case and all the things that have been happening and say that that is unacceptable. I would be breaching a 200m zone, obviously, because I would be trying to get as close to the hospital as I could. Are you absolutely happy that that protest would not in any way fall under this bill?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee 5 March 2024
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
I imagine that I would have a sign about Eljamel.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee 5 March 2024
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Would it be possible for you to write to us with some ways of wording that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee 5 March 2024
Meeting date: 5 March 2024
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2024
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2024
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
I will pick up on that point. Is the bill the only legislation that specifically mentions private dwellings? Do all the pieces of legislation mention them?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2024
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Thanks for the presentation. I have a couple of questions. The first revolves around what has been said about a slippery slope argument in other jurisdictions in which measures have been brought in. We are all aware that the reason is very specific and that the scope of the bill is very tight. However, the bill also says something about private dwellings. The slippery slope argument is, “Well, we’ll bring this in here, but maybe we’ll then be able to say that we will do something else a little later, then we will do that something else,” and we start to erode what happens in a private dwelling.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2024
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Thank you so much for telling us your stories and what happened.
I declare my interest as a practising NHS GP.
This is a hypothetical question, so if you cannot answer it, do not feel that you need to answer it. The protests that you faced very much involved things happening—Lily’s partner at the time was approached. What impact would silent prayers and vigils potentially have had on you? Obviously, that did not actually happen.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2024
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Thank you—that is very helpful.
I open this up to other members of the panel. The bill before us contains provisions that cover putting up posters or signs within private dwellings. We can fully understand the reasons for that. My question to all the panel is whether you think that it is proportionate to have such provisions, and whether you feel that they have been balanced appropriately with the right for people to do almost what they want in their own property.