The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1303 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
In Edinburgh, as in Glasgow, which I represent, we are lucky to have more than one hospice. We do not have enough beds, but we are very lucky to have choice. When someone is in a rural setting and has no choice about where they go, opting out will exclude them from being able to access hospice care. We should not put up any barriers to anyone who wants to access hospice care. Everyone who is dying should receive palliative care.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Thank you. There are people who would want to access assisted dying but who would not want to go through with it straight away after being deemed to be eligible. They would like to have it as an option that they could take a bit later—for example, if they are unable to breathe properly and that is one of the reasons why they want to access it. Under your amendment, would those people be told, “You are not in that position right now, so you cannot access assisted dying and have it as one of the things that you could do”?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
I declare my interest as a practising general practitioner in the national health service.
It will be for the medical profession to deal with implementing the bill and actually doing the work, which is the same as with many other aspects of medical training. As a GP, I have a professional responsibility to keep myself up to date; medicine changes every 10 years, and everything that doctors learn at medical school becomes almost useless after they qualify. Given that, would it be better to allow the professionals to decide what training they need as part of a process that must evolve, because things change, rather than having MSPs making absolute decisions that they are not qualified to make?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
I want everyone to live their best life. I want people with disabilities to live their best life. Your amendments seek to get people with disabilities in front of social workers, but would this be the right point to do that? Should we not be getting people with disabilities to social workers a lot earlier than in the final moments of their life? That would help everyone and not just those who are right at the end.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
First, I agree that nothing is risk free and that everything has risks or side effects. In amendment 158, you expressly state:
“including any potential risks of pain.”
I wonder whether you would be amenable to working with Mr McArthur to change that, so that it says that full informed consent is required in the same way as I would be expected to get full informed consent if I were to give somebody antibiotics.
13:00Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
For clarification, does amendment 100 mean that if somebody has been diagnosed with a terminal illness, that could lead to them being vulnerable just because they have that diagnosis, which would then preclude them from being able to access assisted dying for people with terminal illnesses?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Absolutely.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
The Abortion Act 1967 allows the NHS to perform abortions. That is contrary to the point that you made about preserving life. Would you suggest that the 1967 act contravenes the point of the NHS?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
I agree with that—I would go as far as saying that that was literally the next thing that I was going to say. I absolutely agree with everything that has just been said.
I cannot support a period of three months; it is far too short. I am sympathetic to Mr Johnson’s suggested period of six months, but I do not think that I will support that, because I feel that it is up to the individual to make the decision. I hope that we can agree to amendment 24 and take forward that change in definition. I would agree with Jackie Baillie’s amendments, too, but everything is in amendment 24.
09:30Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Pam Duncan-Glancy has the opportunity to lodge an amendment that says that people with disabilities cannot access assisted dying. I would not support such an amendment, because I think that individuals, disabled or not, get to make decisions on their own quality of life and on how they want their life to continue—or, if they are diagnosed with a terminal illness, to say, “I am not prepared to continue with what has happened to me and the issues that this terminal illness has created.” That could be at any stage.