The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1135 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
With my final question, I want to focus on workload. Obviously, your system is very different from ours. Here in the United Kingdom, we do not charge. How many people per capita would you say go through the assisted dying process? I do not mean how many complete the process; how many at least start the process? If we had that information, that would help us to work out what that would mean for the workload over here.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Is a different amount of training required for the different parts of what happens? For example, is there a bespoke version of the training for your care co-ordinator or the doctor who would administer the medications?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
I have a question about workload. In Australia, is assisted dying something that is provided by independent practitioners who perform that role in particular, or is it added on to the role that, for example, a general practitioner would perform here?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Good morning. I remind the committee of my entry in the register of members’ interests, which states that I am a practising NHS general practitioner.
Professor Smith, you have said today that we need more evidence in this area. You have also said:
“The Cass Review highlighted that the evidence for prescribing gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue to suppress puberty is inadequate and the risk of short- or long-term harm remains uncertain.”
My question to you, therefore, is this. Why were we allowed to get in a position in which such medication was given to children, even though, according to your own words, the knowledge about it is uncertain and inadequate?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
I want to ask two questions, if I may.
Building on Emma Harper’s questions, I note that Professor Ellis said that the MDT would include a psychiatrist. We know from comparative studies that transgender young people are about four times more likely to think about attempting suicide, and the latest stats show that, in 2023, more than 7,000 children and young people had their referrals rejected by CAMHS, which is an average of 26 children a day. How are you going to get psychiatry involved in this particular MDT if we cannot provide basic services to children around our country at the moment?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
In the devolved health service, we are watching, but we did not do anything to start it off.
My final question is for Professor Strath. Will you please give us an update on where we are with current research and current indications on what is happening? I appreciate that it is always difficult to tell with trials, but roughly when will we get an update?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Professor Smith, hospitals are pushing more and more things to GPs—and I say that as a GP. The standards, as written, make it clear that gender services are able to push prescribing to GPs, too. Having spoken to many GPs, I know that they are very concerned, and a lot of them are not comfortable with prescribing puberty blockers, because, for example, they feel that such activity is off licence, they are awaiting robust evidence or they see that there is no formal protocol. Moreover, the Royal College of General Practitioners supports GPs not taking on shared care, there is the potential for litigation if patients decide that puberty blockers are harming them, one in two patients have, as Professor Ellis has told us, underlying mental health issues, and the General Medical Council has told us that prescribing must be appropriate.
If those issues are not addressed, are we following GMC competence? Can you reassure me that the prescribing of puberty blockers will not be pushed to primary care without GPs having the credentials—and, indeed, wanting—to take that work on, and that all GPs will be able to opt out?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Absolutely, and that is where we are right now, but my question goes back to when the services were set up, when things were beginning and money was being spent on creating a service. Explain to me what randomised controlled trial—for “quality” and “safety”, in your own words—said that the prescribing of GnRH to children was acceptable and safe in this case.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Yes.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
It is not really, because it was England that decided to do the Cass review, not us. The emerging evidence did not push us into asking whether we should pause, or have a think about where we are and launch such work. England did that and we have followed on the back of it. I do not necessarily think that what you say is exactly the case.