The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1468 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
I feel that the most important thing here is that we have tie-up with other nations and that we have very clear boundaries, because the minister said that we would be the first country in the UK to offer this option. As long as we have a very smooth process across the UK, I do not have any objections.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Is it clear that prions would be destroyed in that scenario?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
I declare an interest as a practising NHS GP.
Given the policy objectives and the movement to a high-trust, low-bureaucracy approach, I would be interested to know what sampling is taking place in terms of looking at a proportion of practices to ensure compliance. We have just been discussing death certificates, and we sample about 10 per cent of death certificates to ensure accuracy.
Moving on to the mandatory training aspect, I fully support the idea of getting people into work as dentists and, on the face of it, giving people a provisional status for six months is a very good thing. My question is, does that concern the NHS only, or does it include private work? Can a dentist take the six months and perform private work? Is there any oversight of the dentist over those first six months?
Those are my only questions. In general, I support the move to ensure that dentists are working here in Scotland.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
I declare an interest as a practising NHS GP, as stated in my entry in the members’ register of interests.
Good morning, minister. Thank you for coming to the meeting. I have quite a lot of questions for you. My first question is about the definition of regulated healthcare professionals and the list of councils that has been provided. Why have the General Osteopathic Council and the General Chiropractic Council been included in the list? Is that necessary?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
We heard about people going underground and doing things illegally—that is the whole point of going underground. Should practitioners who do not comply with the law be billed by the NHS for mistakes, errors or complications that they cause that force people to come to the NHS for help?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Can you give me an example of how it would work?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Are there any examples of procedures that osteopaths undertake that would be exempted?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
I am sure that my colleagues will come on to that, so I will move on.
The minister spoke about permitted premises being very important. When we took evidence from dentists, they mentioned the fact that not all practices are inspected by HIS and that the regime that applies depends on whether any private work is done in the practice. How will you ensure that dentists and dentists’ premises are captured?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Do you think that you might be able to lodge an amendment in that regard at stage 2 or stage 3?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
I know that time is short, so I will move on to my final question. When people go to the shops to buy paracetamol, they expect the drugs that they can buy—whether we are talking about Panadol or anything else—to essentially be the same thing. They are drugs that work and are regulated. However, we know that Botox is not always Botox, and people buy it from all sorts of different places.
We also know that people’s training is not the same. If you go to a doctor, pharmacist or nurse, you expect a basic level of training. I am keen for the bill to ensure that such training takes place. At one of our first evidence sessions, we heard about a practice that removes moles and skin lumps. The overriding regulator—the person who looks at those lumps and decides whether they are cancer—is not a registered nurse and certainly not a doctor. My fear is that those lumps are not being sent to a pathology lab. I did orthopaedics for many years, and I would not have been allowed just to whip out a lump on my own with no supervision or without the consultant knowing about it. I trained in surgery for a long time. You would not see somebody for a lump or mole who is not a professional and is not regulated. Is that going to fall within the provision to ensure safety and that people are not having cancers removed in that way?
10:15