The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1135 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Would there be a difference between those who are directly employed and those who are—
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
I want to ask about the way that the money is used. My understanding is that a board gets its money through its funding, which is then divided into allocations. I always hear clinicians saying that they are not able to use that money, so who is the determiner of how that money is spent? Is it clinicians, or is it managers? Who do you feel it should be?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Can we start with David, please?
12:15Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
This is directed to Derek Feeley. In your summary, recommendation 17 says:
“Integration Joint Boards should manage GPs’ contractual arrangements, whether independent contractors or directly employed”.
Under that model—in the ideal vision that you have set out—would you want the general practitioner workforce to be directly employed or independent contractors ?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
How would the IJB manage the contracts with independent contractors and those who are directly employed? What are the differences in that management?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
My question is for Derek Feeley. In relation to IJBs, will there be a difference between those who are directly employed under the 2C contracts and independent contractors, or will things be done in much the same way?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
I am sorry—David Walsh.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 September 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Countries with the best-working primary care seem to have better outcomes on health inequality. With GPs being completely overwhelmed, will health inequalities increase and general health decline?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 September 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
We have heard from Sue Robertson—and indeed from the whole panel—about the difficulties that we have with staffing. Adding race inequality on top of that makes life for BAME staff even worse. What can we do to improve race equality in our NHS?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
I was heartened to hear that you have a focus on governance. With that in mind, how will you assess the 10 standards?