The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1135 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
I want to come in on the level of adults’ activity and participation in sport that David Ferguson spoke about. I also want to expand on Stephanie Callaghan’s question and what the convener said.
I love sport. I played competitive sport all the way through university, but in adulthood that activity is gone. Weather and access to facilities are key factors when we leave school. Norway, which has worse weather than we have, deals with that situation well, so how can we improve it?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
I have a number of questions on ethnicity, which Ed Humpherson mentioned in his first response. How can we ensure that we get good ethnicity data for not just patients but the workforce?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
My question is for Martyn Wallace, and maybe also for Christopher Wroath. It is about aim 3, which is about allowing healthcare researchers and innovators secure access to data. How can we give companies and innovators access to anonymised data to improve the services that they can provide, and how do we then get a significant benefit from giving them such access?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
I have a second—brief—question. You have said that there are 900 different data holders at the moment. Under the Caldicott guardian principles, the GP is responsible for the data, but if we move those data to the cloud and go the way that we want to go by giving lots of other people access to them, who will then be responsible? Surely it cannot be the GP.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Everything that we are talking about sounds fantastic with regard to the data that GPs are holding and everyone being fully integrated and so on. However, the fact is that the GP systems—Vision and EMIS—do not talk to each other at the moment; there is no data integration between the two. I realise that I am straddling two themes with this question, but what can be done immediately to allow GPs to access data from another GP data source?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
On the point about data being poorly collected, NHS Lothian’s ethnicity recording went from 3 per cent to 90 per cent over three years. The point about linkage to the CHI number goes back to Emma Harper’s point about data collection fatigue when people are asked about ethnicity on multiple occasions. Surely the way to ensure that all ethnicity data is captured is to ask the question once and link the information to a person’s CHI, which goes through everything.
Once we capture ethnicity data, we must be absolutely sure that we can use that data, when someone presents, to work out symptoms and how we should manage and treat them. For example, a person of black descent with high blood pressure should be started on a calcium channel blocker rather than an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. Ethnicity makes a huge difference to how we treat people.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
I have a question for Christopher Wroath and perhaps Steve Baguley. Does the NHS, including primary and secondary care, have the appropriate hardware and broadband speeds to access the digital platform, cloud sharing and all the wonderful innovations that we are looking to introduce?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Hospital at home was first introduced in NHS Lanarkshire in 2011. It has had great results. In March 2020, Jeane Freeman announced £1 million of funding for the programme. Why, 10 years after hospital at home was first introduced and a year after £1 million was invested, do 10 health boards not have adequate hospital at home resources to prevent admissions?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
The target has not been achieved since 2017. Through the amazing adaptations and digital appointments that have been offered through the Covid pandemic, there has been an increase to 82.7 per cent of people being seen within 18 weeks. Covid is not the reason why we are missing the target, so how could we improve access to psychological therapies and address the fact that we have not hit the HEAT target since 2017?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2021
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Good morning, minister. I declare an interest as a practising NHS doctor.
The health improvement, efficiency and governance, access and treatment—HEAT—target for starting psychological therapy is 18 weeks after referral. Psychological therapy is vital in dealing with patients who have mental health issues. When was the last time the HEAT target was achieved?