The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2062 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning—I think it is still morning. I feel like I have been here so long that I am wondering whether it is still Wednesday.
I appreciate the witnesses’ answers so far. I will ask a general question before I move to general questions on aftercare and, potentially, advocacy—the convener can keep me write this to which area I should focus on.
A number of submissions pick out the issue with the UNCRC. We have just been really clear on the record about what that issue is. However, further to that, the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland submission says that the bill has the potential to have a negative impact. Kate Thompson, will you set out a little bit more for us about what that negative impact could be and whether there are ways to mitigate it?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Convener, in the interests of flow and time, is it your expectation that I will move on to questions of advocacy or aftercare?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Correct me if I am putting different words in your mouth, but I think that you said just a moment ago that some of the costings were unrealistic. What would be more realistic?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you. Someone else will probably ask questions on definitions, but is there a need to amend the legislation in that respect, and/or do we need more guidance and communication regarding who is covered?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Do any of you have a view on whether further detail on advocacy should be in regulations or in the bill, or should some be left to regulations, with more in the bill? What should the balance be?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I am sorry, minister, but the timescales that have been assessed as being appropriate have been in place since the Parliament was set up. As you have rightly pointed out, other Parliaments use the same process. Why has the Government not figured out the costs within six months, in negotiations with the member?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I have to say, minister, that I am quite uncomfortable with the line of questioning that we have just pursued on the difficulties with meeting the requirements of pupils with ASN—and affordability with regard to pupils with ASN—and with coming to an agreement in the timescales. The fact is that Parliament agreed this legislation at stage 1 and agreed that all of these issues should be discussed, and I myself made it clear in committee, both to yourself, minister, and to the member in charge, that the issues for pupils with ASN would have to be considered very carefully.
For me, an important aspect of the bill is that pupils with ASN are able to access this sort of education, including the sorts of experiences that have just been discussed. However, that was a discussion for stage 1. If the Government was so worried about that, the Government should not have voted for the bill. Did the Government abstain because it was not prepared to take the backlash for voting against a bill that not just the public but the Parliament quite clearly wanted?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Finally, then, on pupils with ASN, what advice have you, as the minister in charge of the bill, given to Cabinet?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Okay. Thank you.