The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2383 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Do you think that the support is sufficient for people who need support to get through university, to fund the additional costs that they might have, or do you need to look again at how student support is targeted?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Finally, submissions from the Open University, UWS and others have mentioned the value of part-time studying. We heard about that this morning. Obviously, the part-time fee grant, which is available only to those earning under £25,000, has not been reviewed in a while. Is the Government considering a review of that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Would it be possible to look at that aspect? You say that you do not know whether people are leaving because of a positive reason, such as taking employment, or to go elsewhere. How big a task would it be to start gathering that information?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
It is fairly widely accepted that getting into university is only part of the story, and that staying in and coming out as a graduate are also key measures. The commissioner for fair access suggested that we should give equal weight to entry, student experience and outcomes. What data are you gathering to help us to understand those aspects of the widening access agenda?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I want to ask about one of the things that you announced earlier, minister.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I appreciate that, and thank you for the offer to work together. I would be happy to take up that offer.
Last week, Rebecca Scarlett from Lead Scotland gave evidence. It is important to repeat what she said about the review of support for disabled students that was carried out in 2019 and reported in 2023. Rebecca said that disabled students had
“put a huge amount of resource, energy and time into the review.”
She went on to say:
“The report, which was finally released in 2023, made a ream of recommendations, almost none of which has been implemented. I know that Scottish university heads submitted a request to the Scottish Government that that be taken forward, but next to nothing has happened. Nothing has changed, even in relation to the smallest recommendations that were made, and now the work is all out of date. All that energy, resource and time were invested, but nothing has happened, which is extremely frustrating.”—[Official Report, Education, Children and Young People Committee, 26 February 2025; c 44-5.]
What will be different this time? Can the minister reassure organisations that engaging this time will result in change?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I appreciate that. Thank you.
A group was convened on the back of the 2023 recommendations but has not been reconvened. Would it be fair to ask for that group to be reconvened, with the recommendations of the previous report as a starting point? Could any action that is taken seek to build on those recommendations and action them further, without undoing any of that work and making people feel that they have put in a lot of effort for no reason?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
The UWS example is a good one, and it speaks to the point from my colleague earlier about having to say only once that you need something, doing so early and having the time to do that. You recognised that, if people do not have their conditional offer in time, there is not much time to do that, so the example is useful.
You talked earlier about some students not necessarily staying on and leaving education for other reasons—perhaps to go and take work for financial reasons—rather than what might be best for their future career prospects. The National Union of Students Scotland published a report saying that education is free, which we all support, but that studying is not. On that basis and in that context, do you think that the current way in which spending on student support is structured means that it reaches the students who need it the most?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
On measuring retention at first year and into second year, we heard evidence from young people that, if there is a drop-off at that point, that could sometimes be because people have realised that university may not be where they want to be, so looking at retention into third and fourth year might give a stronger picture of what is happening in institutions that is either helping people to stay or not. Are you considering looking at that?