The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2062 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you. That was really helpful and is much appreciated.
The Law Society notes in its submission that
“no consideration has been given to ... those who have been adopted ... Children subject to voluntary measures of supervision and support (under ... the Children (Scotland) Act 1995)”
and
“Children from outside the Scottish jurisdiction, who have been placed”
in care elsewhere
“whilst under an English Care Order”.
Can you say a bit more about that? Is it your view that the bill should contain specific aftercare provision for those particular people?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you, convener. I have just two small questions.
In some of the evidence that has been submitted to us, it has been suggested that those involved in delivering services should not be involved in advocacy. What is your view of that? I suppose that it speaks to the question of independence.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
That was helpful.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning, minister and officials. I have to say that I am disappointed, although I do not think that that will come as a surprise to anyone, including the minister. The minister said last night that the process exists elsewhere. However, if I may say so, there is a mischaracterisation of the process. The process is there, in my understanding, not for the Government to block the will of Parliament, which has already decided that the bill should progress to stage 2. Rather, it is there for the Government to set out its understanding of what the cost of the legislation would be, so that Parliament can make decisions on amendments to manage the cost in one way or another and, ultimately, make a decision at stage 3. Not providing that information right now is a dereliction of responsibility and a complete disregard of the will of Parliament.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I have one final question and a comment. If I am honest, it is not necessarily the case that the Parliament has not already been asked, in this parliamentary session, to support a bill with unknown costs.
A commitment was made to the committee that consideration would be given to any costs associated with ensuring that pupils with ASN could enjoy the rights that the Parliament has intended them to enjoy as a result of the bill. Since then, what analysis has the Government done on that issue?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
On the timeframe, will you complete that work within the next fortnight?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
It is pretty clear that people are not content with the Government’s position on this matter just now.
A number of the issues that we have raised are exactly the sorts of issues that members would like to pursue in amendments at stage 2, and then ultimately ask whether they have been addressed when we look at the bill again at stage 3. However, given the Government’s position in abstaining at stage 1 and failing so far, with just two weeks—days—left, to produce a financial memorandum to resolve these issues, it is likely that if one is produced, it is going to be without some information that the Government should have collected and, if it is not produced, the parliamentary process will have been frustrated.
Moreover, with some of the stuff that we have just discussed about pupils with ASN, those inequalities are happening right now in the current status quo. That suggests to me that the Government should get its skates on, get the financial resolution published and allow Parliament to resolve some of these matters through stages 2 and 3, so that pupils with ASN can fully access their rights to outdoor education.
09:30Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning. I thank the witnesses for the evidence that they submitted in advance of the meeting and the questions that they have answered so far. I will ask about the parts of the bill that are specifically on aftercare, but, before I do so, I will pick up on a couple of issues that have been touched on.
Fraser McKinlay, you highlighted one of the issues that I heard about when I spoke to young people with care experience and others who support them in the sector, which is about access to housing and access to education. The education outcomes have just been published, and they are not where they need to be. What are the main issues that care-experienced young people face today, and will the bill address any of them?
10:00Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Do you think that there are potentially opportunities to amend the current bill to do some of that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you. I appreciate that. I had not considered that in any great detail, so it is helpful for the committee’s consideration.
Do the panel members have any views on capacity? We have heard about the need not to pile additional bureaucracy on an already stretched workforce. I suppose that the same is true of the hearings system. What changes might be needed in capacity in the system to enable this to be done properly?