The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1674 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you, convener, and good morning, cabinet secretary and officials.
We have heard a lot of evidence on the bill and I am sure that the cabinet secretary will have carefully watched, or listened to, most if not all of it. A number of people remain concerned that the bill still does not resolve some of the issues. For example, Ken Muir told the committee:
“it is probably not the case that the bill, as it is currently constituted, will drive a bottom-up approach.”—[Official Report, Education, Children and Young People Committee, 18 September 2024; c 9.]
The cabinet secretary spoke about the need to take people with her, but the evidence has suggested to us that people are not necessarily going with her on this. How would she respond to those comments?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
That is appreciated, and I think that most people will agree that standing still is not an option. The higher history stuff is an example of that. The Association of Directors of Education told us, and teachers also told us, that they do not think that the bill responds to their views in the way that you have suggested. That is something that you should reflect on.
If it is not about legislation and it is not always about structures, how would the Government characterise responsive leadership? How has it supported that and a good culture in education in the past 10 years?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
My question is in a similar vein. The Government has laid quite a lot of responsibility for fixing some of the issues with the qualifications body and the wider education landscape on the charters. How will the Government ensure that the charters are sufficiently ambitious?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I do not think that that would be an unfair fear.
We have also heard evidence, including from Connect, that there is no explicit role for parents. Indeed, the children’s commissioner raised that issue last week with regard to the role of children and mechanisms for engaging children in the process. There are concerns that there is not enough in the bill to protect relevant interests in the development of the charters, and I would like a further response on that.
In the interests of time, I will ask my other question. If the new body does not meet the expectations that are set out in the charters, what can anyone do about it?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
It is also the point that Ken Muir made when he said that the bill, as drafted, does not yet give the “bottom-up approach” that is needed to do what the cabinet secretary wants. Do you agree with that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I want to pick up on the point about the bill making provision for BSL and inclusive communication. Could it be strengthened in that sense?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you, convener. Good morning to the panel members. There have been suggestions throughout the process for this bill that the culture of the SQA needs to be improved when the new body takes over, so can the panel members say what they believe was or is wrong with the culture in the SQA and what good corporate culture would look like instead?
09:15Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I can, thank you convener. Good morning to the witnesses and thank you to you all. I want to say up front that I acknowledge how difficult this morning’s conversation is, so I thank you for coming. I really appreciate it and I am sure that other members do, too. The staff voice in this is crucial.
We have touched on the point about leadership, but I want to go a step further. I asked the Scottish Government in a written question
“whether there should be reserved space on the new board of Qualifications Scotland for trade union representation in addition to staff representation.”
The Government said that its position was as stated in the bill and that the board would
“consist of one or more members who have knowledge of the interests of the staff of Qualifications Scotland”.—[Written Answers, 14 August 2024; S6W-28803.]
Pauline Rodger and Sharon McGuigan, how well do you think that the current arrangements, in which a staff representative is on the board of the SQA, ensure that the voice of the staff body is heard? What are your views of the proposed arrangements as set out in the Government’s response to my question?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
What is preventing that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Do the witnesses think that what is proposed is enough to stop something like 2020 happening again?