The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1674 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
It sounds like a really co-ordinated support package. When Fraser McKinlay gave evidence, he said that the system can sometimes get in the way of itself—that is how he described it. Claire Burns noted that co-ordination can unlock barriers. How have you been able to do that? Tell us. Help us understand how you have been able to unlock systemic barriers through that co-ordinated approach.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you. That is helpful.
I will move slightly towards the unmet need question that we have heard about. We spoke about some of the schools and we heard Liz Nolan and Fiona Bradford talk about there being a code of silence. Young people who are going through things might not necessarily be known to the system, and their families might not know about it. Liz Nolan mentioned areas in Scotland, of which Glasgow is one, where there is some need. CELCIS gave evidence in advance of this session and said that we need more data on that, because some people fall through the cracks.
Fiona Bradford, I will come to you first. What more could we do across services to make sure that does not happen?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
So much has come out of this session. I am sure that we all hugely appreciate the time that you have given and the important situations that you have put on the record. Thank you for doing that.
I want to look a little bit more at education with Claire McGuigan. You mentioned that seven schools out of 17 in your area have access to the pathfinders service, which means that 10 schools do not. We know that young people with care experience are more likely to not attend school and are more likely to be excluded. We know that the outcomes are not what we need them to be for those young people to flourish and, ultimately, for us to be able to deliver the Promise for them. Can you tell us what you and your service do to support attendance in schools so that children can flourish at school?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
It is less than £1 million per local authority, and the need is particularly great, but—
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Can I ask a question in relation to universities?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I echo some of the points that have been made with regard to the clarity that has been provided—thank you for that. However, can you provide some further clarity, minister? In your letter to the SFC, on sustainability, you said:
“while careful consideration must be given to the financial sustainability of individual institutions, I expect SFC to consider the wider landscape of provision and the needs of learners”.
That could be quite widely interpreted. Will you take this opportunity to clarify that you have no intention of letting an institution, college or university fail?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning. Across the rest of the UK, there are different models for funding university tuition. Within those models—in Wales and elsewhere in the UK—solutions have been found. With that in mind, what solutions is the Scottish Government looking at?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
My point is to ask what the Scottish Government’s approach is within the funding model that is being used.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Of course not.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Of course, and that trust is one of the reasons why I made my earlier comments. However, there is still a 2 per cent reduction in raising attainment money, and I think that it is quite clear for all to see that that is a real concern in schools just now.
I will just clarify what I am talking about in relation to the 2 per cent reduction, before someone challenges me on it. The strategic equity fund remains at around £43 million, but the total of the SEF is planned to be reduced in 2025-26 as the transitional taper from the challenge authority model to the SEF ends. In real terms, that means that about 2 per cent less is going into raising attainment than was the case in 2024-25.
You have also—