The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1674 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I appreciate that, and it brings me to my final question. What will change if the bill is passed? You have spoken about the qualifications committee and a schools unit, but what will be different after the bill is passed and why should we, as parliamentarians, and the public have confidence that things will change?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I want to ask specifically about the cabinet secretary’s direction. I understand a lot of the obligations that you have set out, and I am sure that there are many. Did you get any direction from the cabinet secretary in relation to the SATH survey?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
A number of the questions that I was going to ask were around culture, and they have already been covered.
I will take us back to 2020, when SATH said that similar circumstances had occurred. I understand that SATH has suggested that there were two exchanges—one email and one phone call—that made it clear that the SQA was displeased with the survey and that it could potentially lead to the SQA failing to support SATH in the future. That was in 2020, when a similar survey, I assume, resulted in similar circumstances. How did we end up here again, if a similar incident had already happened? What is different this time that will convince subject organisations that engagement with the body will be respectful and collaborative?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I will pick up on the original response from Shirley Rogers about the people on the panel not necessarily being there in 2020. I accept that, I do, but it happened in 2020—I say “it”—and it seems that something similar is happening again. Short of saying, “Trust me,” which, as you said, will not do it, what will mean that we will not be back here in another couple of years?
In addition, what engagement have you had with the cabinet secretary and what has she asked of you in this regard?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I am content to consider them together, but I have a question about one of them. Is it okay to put that question now?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
It is a fee waiver for volunteers, but it is not for other low-paid staff who the fee is sometimes passed on to?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Is there any specific action that you think will be taken within the next six months to improve the situation?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I agree with that. Seeing the change will be really important.
Since the issues around the history paper arose—and I have some more questions on that—I have been contacted by teachers who have had concerns with timetabling, for example. We know that there were recent timetable changes. One teacher came back and said that the way that languages exams will now be structured means that students who are learning a couple of languages will have to sit their exams in close succession. He referred to the
“new exam timetable following complaints … I looked at it and they’ve now got the Spanish and French ... exams on consecutive days. ANY languages teacher, if they’d bothered to ask us, would have told them this is a recipe for disaster”.
The reason why I mention that is that it is another example of teachers feeling that they have not been engaged with.
The teacher went on to say:
“they fully admit to willingly throwing us under the bus”.
I have heard this morning that you have accepted some of the criticism, but that is a real issue. There are teachers who are so disengaged that they feel that the experiences of their pupils are beginning to creep in as a concern, even on timetabling issues now.
Did you speak to any language teachers about the timetabling issue? What do you think will change as a result of the examples that you have given today, including the schools unit, that would make a difference for that teacher?
10:00Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
What specific actions could be taken by the teacher that I mentioned, teachers in classrooms today who feel a similar way or the teachers that we heard representations from on the history paper to raise their concerns now, so they do not necessarily have to wait? I get that some changes will take a bit longer, but what can those teachers do now, and how can they be reassured that their concerns will be properly addressed?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Okay. Thank you.