The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1674 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I want to ask about one of the things that you announced earlier, minister.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I appreciate that, and thank you for the offer to work together. I would be happy to take up that offer.
Last week, Rebecca Scarlett from Lead Scotland gave evidence. It is important to repeat what she said about the review of support for disabled students that was carried out in 2019 and reported in 2023. Rebecca said that disabled students had
“put a huge amount of resource, energy and time into the review.”
She went on to say:
“The report, which was finally released in 2023, made a ream of recommendations, almost none of which has been implemented. I know that Scottish university heads submitted a request to the Scottish Government that that be taken forward, but next to nothing has happened. Nothing has changed, even in relation to the smallest recommendations that were made, and now the work is all out of date. All that energy, resource and time were invested, but nothing has happened, which is extremely frustrating.”—[Official Report, Education, Children and Young People Committee, 26 February 2025; c 44-5.]
What will be different this time? Can the minister reassure organisations that engaging this time will result in change?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I appreciate that. Thank you.
A group was convened on the back of the 2023 recommendations but has not been reconvened. Would it be fair to ask for that group to be reconvened, with the recommendations of the previous report as a starting point? Could any action that is taken seek to build on those recommendations and action them further, without undoing any of that work and making people feel that they have put in a lot of effort for no reason?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
The UWS example is a good one, and it speaks to the point from my colleague earlier about having to say only once that you need something, doing so early and having the time to do that. You recognised that, if people do not have their conditional offer in time, there is not much time to do that, so the example is useful.
You talked earlier about some students not necessarily staying on and leaving education for other reasons—perhaps to go and take work for financial reasons—rather than what might be best for their future career prospects. The National Union of Students Scotland published a report saying that education is free, which we all support, but that studying is not. On that basis and in that context, do you think that the current way in which spending on student support is structured means that it reaches the students who need it the most?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
On measuring retention at first year and into second year, we heard evidence from young people that, if there is a drop-off at that point, that could sometimes be because people have realised that university may not be where they want to be, so looking at retention into third and fourth year might give a stronger picture of what is happening in institutions that is either helping people to stay or not. Are you considering looking at that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I appreciate the way in which you answered the price tag question, minister. Can you set out in a bit more detail how the figure of £15 million came about?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
But it was not linked to the scale or scope of any of the challenges facing the sector.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Sorry, I meant to ask whether you think that the funding that you give institutions covers all the costs of the additional widening access aspects that we have discussed this morning.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you.