The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2169 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Finally on this line of questioning, the Audit Scotland report that was published this morning says that
“there is no formal mechanism for CSPPs to be held accountable specifically for delivering The Promise.”
In your reimagined future, how would you hold them accountable?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Would it be fair to say, then, that you are structurally agnostic?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Audit Scotland also talks in its report about the Care Inspectorate and its scrutiny work, and it picks up on what scrutiny bodies such as the inspectorate do. It says—I will read from the report to ensure that I get the quote exactly right—
“the Care Inspectorate has a well-developed work programme to support The Promise, relative to others, such as the Scottish Housing Regulator, whose work is compliance based.”
Is there any need or scope for other regulators to have further duties or to play a further role in delivering the Promise?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Against that backdrop, do you think that the proposal is workable?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you. Did you want to comment, Professor Sengupta?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Sorry, but can I interrupt you? If they are not already meeting the duties, surely that would not be duplication. This is about underlining what needs to be done and encouraging them to do it.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
If they had different approaches, would it not be highlighted that the IJB was part of the process?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
What would you do differently to enable a system that plans more coherently and works in a more joined-up way for children and young people?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Do you work with other regulators on that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
One of the suggestions in the bill to take some complexity out of the system relates to the way in which IJBs are involved in children’s planning. We met care-experienced children and young people last night. Much of what they were talking about was the connectedness of their lives and the fact that they do not live in silos. Do you think that the structures and systems in local authorities are able to properly deal with the complexity?