The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2251 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning. I will ask a question about aftercare—specifically housing—before I move on to another area. The young people who we spoke to about this legislation felt that some specifics were missing, such as action in certain areas. In some ways, this has been described as a framework bill. However, the young people also said to us, “What about education?”, “What about housing?”, “What about employment?”, and so on.
My colleague Willie Rennie started to ask about the question of housing. I note your response about North Yorkshire not being a country. However, our problem is that, if we do not do something that is quite specific and empowers local authorities to take action, including with resources backed up to do it, we are really just washing our hands of any responsibility. The response that you gave does not give us much reassurance that the Government is prepared to take the action that is necessary to support local government to do the right thing on the Promise bill. Is that accurate?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
How?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Sorry, minister, they do not, because the bit that the bill refers to is outwith the scope of the UNCRC.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good afternoon, minister—we are just into the afternoon.
I want to ask about children’s hearings and, specifically, single-member panels. Witnesses, including those from the Scottish Children’s Reporter Administration, the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland, Clan Childlaw and the Law Society of Scotland, said that more clarity is required on the proposals for single-member panels—for example, what is meant by “procedural”?—to ensure that children’s rights are upheld. Some young people who attended the committee’s evidence session with Who Cares? Scotland said the same and were not supportive of single-member panels. Our Hearings, Our Voice found that most young people it spoke to did not support the proposals, either. What is the minister’s response to that? Does the Government have any plans to address those concerns?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Could you not just write the gaps in? If the 1995 act has gaps—presumably it does—could you not just write them into this bill?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Perhaps we can do some of that just now, because it would be helpful to get your views on the record. Do you think that a single-member panel should be able to establish grounds?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Forgive me; I did not pick that up.
My next question is about the obligation on a child to attend a hearing. Generally, witnesses have supported the removal of the obligation, but a number of them felt that it could be replaced by a presumption of attendance, as was recommended by the hearings system working group. Why did the Government choose not to include a presumption of attendance in the bill? Do you feel that there is adequate provision to ensure that children’s voices are heard?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
As would I. Prevention is always more appropriate than cure—I think that that is the phrase. However, having the power to do something and having the resources and capacity to deliver on that power are two different things. Is the minister confident that local authorities will have the resources and capacity to deliver the power that she is hoping to give them?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Forgive me, Mr McCaffrey, but is that not why we have passed new legislation since 1995, which was a long time ago? If that bill had been tight enough on children’s rights, we would not necessarily have needed parts of the UNCRC, but we did, and we have this new bill, which is surely an opportunity. You have said that we are not starting from scratch, but this is a new bill, so you could include the UNCRC and those particular areas in it.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Forgive me, minister, but I am slightly confused. What appears to have been said is that we cannot introduce any legislation that includes provisions on further rights that are set out by the UNCRC, because we cannot tinker with any previous legislation. Have I misunderstood? Is that your understanding?