The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1219 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Paul Sweeney
Is there a balance to be struck around the clinical nature of diagnostic pathways? Are there examples from around the world of alternatives that could offer a better structure for Scotland?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Paul Sweeney
Are you aiming to get a clear picture of what the national baseline should be and of how each local authority or integration joint board is performing against that national baseline? Is that your ultimate goal as minister?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Paul Sweeney
We have heard from various stakeholders that support, information and resources are highly variable, particularly for neurodivergent people who are waiting for a diagnosis. To judge by the experiences that we have heard about, that seems to be a bit of a doom loop. We know that support should be available without the need for a diagnosis but, in practice, someone cannot get support without a diagnosis. We know that, for example, education authorities often use diagnosis as a gate-keeping tool in order to ration resources in the context of funding constraints.
How does the minister propose that we address that doom loop, which is a fundamental problem that repeatedly comes up as an issue? How do we open up a much wider discussion on the lack of support for neurodivergent people across the NHS? At the very least, we should be signposting people to the relevant support while they are waiting for a formal diagnosis.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Paul Sweeney
The organisation child heads of psychology services in Scotland made the interesting point that there are areas of good practice. In its submission, it identified NHS Lanarkshire and NHS Lothian as having
“developed a bank of digital resources offered to those waiting to be seen, however this is not the case across the country”.
Do you share the view that a once-for-Scotland standard should be adopted? Do you agree that there should be rigorous benchmarking against good practice and that approaches should be brought under a national standard?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Paul Sweeney
Will you elaborate on your point about how we ensure that that is delivered? What mechanisms are at your disposal in the civil service to benchmark, assess and hold accountable authorities for not complying with standards?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Paul Sweeney
Where have you seen it done well?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Paul Sweeney
Does anyone else on the panel have anything to say on the issue of funding optimisation in an organisation?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Paul Sweeney
Thank you, Dr Srireddy. Does anyone else have any comments on that issue or suggestions for organisational improvement?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Paul Sweeney
Good morning. It has been really insightful to hear what our witnesses have had to say about some of the absurdities of the current system and how it militates against good patient outcomes and good outcomes for public resources.
One of the recurring themes that the committee observes concerns the disconnect between national priorities for the healthcare system and localised funding decisions that are made by integration joint boards and health and social care partnerships around funding for autism and ADHD services. Do our witnesses have any insights, recommendations or perhaps wisdom to share from their professional experience about how we might get to a situation in which local services have stable funding that is also modelled to support good patient outcomes and better use of public resources than we see in the current, inefficient model? What could we do to improve it?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Paul Sweeney
Thank you for your initial comments, Dr Priyadarshi. It is promising to hear that there has been an uptick in the patronage and use of the facility over the past six months or so.
I want to establish some of the trends that you mentioned around cocaine injection, because you said that 70 per cent of injection episodes were related to cocaine. Can you comment on the typical pattern of behaviour for cocaine injection, particularly the frequency of the episodes relative to heroin and how it presents? Is there a greater frequency of injecting as a result of cocaine use?