The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1119 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Paul Sweeney
That is really helpful. I just needed to get it clear in my head. Thank you for indulging me, convener.
The key point for me is the lack of enforcement. I was concerned that the petitioners mentioned that Scottish Forestry was initially gung-ho about enforcement in the case in Argyll and then seemed to have a gentleman’s agreement to let it lie, which is a bit problematic. There is also the question of how we enforce more robust measures, like we do with ancient monuments.
That helps to clear the matter up for me. I do not know about the rest of the committee.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Paul Sweeney
Yes, convener. I briefly emphasise the point about what seems to be a grey area. The Cathkin Braes country park BMX trail, for example, was done as a result of planning permission for the Commonwealth games. I am astounded that such a development does not require planning consent. If a ski slope was developed in Glenshee, for example, planning consent would be required. There should be further investigation into where we draw the line. Why are councils not looking at that issue, perhaps not in relation to legislation but as a gap? There is also the issue of enforcement when people just do stuff without seeking planning permission.
10:45Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Paul Sweeney
Welcome to our committee, Callum. It is great to hear from you. I heard that you went to visit the 26th United Nations climate change conference of the parties—COP26—in Glasgow last year. Did you have a nice time there?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Paul Sweeney
Brilliant. There were a lot of bosses of different kinds at COP26, so at least you got to see some important people. Did you talk to him about your idea?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Paul Sweeney
So you have a ringing endorsement from the science centre—that is good to hear.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Paul Sweeney
Yes.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Paul Sweeney
That is helpful.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Paul Sweeney
Certainly.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Paul Sweeney
It was cubic metres, not hectares—that would be extreme.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Paul Sweeney
That is helpful. How easy is it to enforce that or to compel the landowner or landlord to comply with those instructions?