The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1119 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 May 2022
Paul Sweeney
Thank you for that insight.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 May 2022
Paul Sweeney
In a previous evidence session, Dr Terry O’Kelly, a senior medical adviser to the Scottish Government, advised us that the Shouldice technique
“will not be applicable to non-inguinal hernias; it might also not be appropriate for patients with larger defects, or for very degenerative tissues.”—[Official Report, Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee, 6 October 2021; c 21.]
Do you agree with Dr O’Kelly’s assessment?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 May 2022
Paul Sweeney
That is helpful.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 May 2022
Paul Sweeney
Thank you very much for taking part in our inquiry into the use of surgical mesh, Dr Spencer Netto. Chronic post-operative pain is clearly a substantial issue for many hernia repair patients, regardless of the type of repair that has been undertaken. What causes such pain?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Paul Sweeney
I fully agree with that idea. The petitioner and several respondents to the petition have been trying to establish parity with other practices in the UK, and it is important to investigate where practices should align.
I felt that the Royal College of Pathologists submission was a bit excessive in making the point about potential legal reasons for retaining samples from bodies. The implication that next of kin might want to defeat the ends of justice by denying a post mortem was potentially quite offensive. That would be the case in a limited and significant set of circumstances only. It is not relevant to the petition.
We need to understand exactly what the Royal College of Pathologists means by that. A thorough investigation is probably needed into the circumstances in which samples would be retained for a criminal investigation. In due course, once it is established that there is no foul play in relation to a death, the samples could be released for burial or whatever the family wishes to do with them.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Paul Sweeney
The main consideration for a lot of people in relation to the changes has been aviation safety. What is your union’s position on the implications of the changes in air traffic control for aviation safety?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Paul Sweeney
I agree with our closing the petition, but perhaps we could advise the petitioner that the facility of contacting their local member or members of the Scottish Parliament is available to them for lodging written questions closer to the time to get more detail on the nature of the advertising campaign. If there is further dissatisfaction with how the campaign is running, that could be addressed through their local members of the Scottish Parliament.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Paul Sweeney
I recall the petitioners presenting a particular case study. If we are planning a visit, it might be interesting to visit that location to see the situation on the ground.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Paul Sweeney
Welcome to the committee, Mr Avery, and thanks for the submission on behalf of your members in HIAL. How confident are you that the arrangements for the development of a new air traffic control strategy will produce results that are acceptable to your members in HIAL?
10:00Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Paul Sweeney
In your submission to the committee of 7 March, you said that working groups on the future of air traffic control, particularly at Wick and Benbecula, were yet to be established. Has there been any progress on that? Would you like to see that happen? Is there a need for that?