The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1119 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Paul Sweeney
That is certainly worth considering.
I also want to offer a couple of ideas. The issue is a very good candidate for a member’s bill—I am sure that the committee has noted that. It might be worth discussing that with the committee, and with your constituency and regional MSPs, who might be interested in the idea of sponsoring such a bill. MSPs have certainly been working in that field and it might be of interest to them. That is another potential mechanism by which to achieve the remedy.
I will rest on that, for now, convener.
09:45Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Paul Sweeney
Certainly, when we look at alternative technologies that are available in other jurisdictions—particularly in London, where there is an automatic fare-capping system that was introduced five or six years ago—we see that there are solutions that could offer a remedy, particularly on intra-Scotland travel as opposed to travel to other parts of the UK. Perhaps it is worth inviting submissions from the likes of Transport for London about its fare-capping technology and how it has been rolled out. That could offer a basis for how a system could be delivered in Scotland.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Paul Sweeney
It is harrowing to listen to your personal experience and to recognise how deficient the law in Scotland is on the matter. The committee has received a submission setting out the fact that the statutory provisions in other parts of the United Kingdom are much stronger in relation to the statutory offence of child destruction as an aggravating factor.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Paul Sweeney
I think that the Scottish Government’s response did not address the primary aggravating factor of the death of an unborn child. It was concerned merely with the offence of domestic abuse, and there was no aggravating factor that could be defined in law. In some of the cases in Scotland in which that has happened, the sentences have been particularly light compared with those in other parts of the UK. Do you agree that that is an inadequate response from the Scottish Government?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Paul Sweeney
It is interesting that there was an idea that issues in the petition have been conflated and that some issues were mixed up around devolved and reserved competences. I thought that it would be worth while trying to unpack that a bit. Certainly, I raised some questions around the interaction between Scottish ministers and UK Government ministers, particularly Alister Jack and Greg Hands. Is it worth inviting those ministers to offer a view regarding the Electricity Act 1989 and the provisions therein? I often think that, when we actually test some of these technical matters, they are often just devolved because people say, “That is probably better over there.”
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Paul Sweeney
We could add to that correspondence to the Scottish Government a question to ascertain its view on the fare-capping “tap in, tap out” technology. I know that it has been promoted for buses in Scotland, but I have not heard much in relation to rail.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Paul Sweeney
You mentioned the idea of an amendment rather than the need for a discrete, completely new act. Can you develop your thinking on that a bit more?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Paul Sweeney
When I read the papers for today’s meeting, I noticed that the Scottish Law Commission’s current work programme includes two projects—one on homicide and one on aspects of family law. Both come close to the topic of the petition, but neither covers the actual issue that has been raised. Another avenue to explore could involve a meeting with the Scottish Law Commission. The committee might be able to facilitate such a meeting to discuss those projects and the potential interface with the particular issue and the deficiencies that you have highlighted today.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Paul Sweeney
It would perhaps be worth writing to the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities and to the 32 local authority education services to ascertain what provision they make within schools. That could help to establish a pattern of activity.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Paul Sweeney
Does that provide a good framework through which the law in Scotland could be brought up to the same level?