The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1119 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Paul Sweeney
There is provision for free bus travel. Why is it so important to extend that to rail travel?
10:15Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Paul Sweeney
Another key point about support from our pharmacy network more generally was about ensuring that people who are released from custody or those who are caring for them if they have a support network are provided with naloxone. The evidence that has been provided has indicated that that is a patchy practice. What is the minister doing to ensure that it is more of a standard protocol?
10:30Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Paul Sweeney
I have one final question, if I may, convener. A key part of the wider network that supports people being released from custody is referrals to supervised overdose prevention facilities, which were highlighted as a key measure in the reduction of harm while someone is going from a supervised setting to being unsupervised. I am cognisant of the Glasgow pilot on such a facility. Can the minister provide an update on progress with that pilot and on the interaction with local custody settings as a mechanism for referring vulnerable people to it?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Paul Sweeney
That is very helpful.
I understand that approximately 78 per cent of those who use the disabled bus travel concessionary scheme have a companion allowance, so that seems to be a major aspect of using that scheme.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Paul Sweeney
Do you have any idea of the total number of people who might utilise such a scheme in Scotland? I want to get an idea of the scale of that relative to the overall passenger cohort in Scotland.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Paul Sweeney
I think that we have that.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Paul Sweeney
Yes. Overall, we are talking about 146,000 people. If that is broken down into different components, disabled +1 companions number about 105,000. That is helpful.
A point has been made about bus travel versus rail travel, but a lot of journeys are highly integrated, and people might need to take a bus and then a train. Would the approach help to make it more seamless for people who have a visual impairment to navigate the transport system more generally?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Paul Sweeney
It also might be interesting to make inquiries regarding the financing of the scheme. I note that the current concessionary travel scheme for older and disabled persons has a 55 per cent rate against the full adult single fare, and it has an overall budgetary cap of £226 million in the current financial year. It would be interesting to see what the utilisation rate of that budget is and whether the proposal could be funded through the existing provision, if it is the case that it is underutilised.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Paul Sweeney
I support those proposals.
I note that a similar petition was considered in 2014, at which point it was recommended that there should be oversight, but the Government advised that it was too soon to consider doing that in the light of the legislation in 2002. It feels like we are sufficiently distant from that juncture and should now reconsider the issue and whether there might be a means for the Scottish Parliament, as an institution, to hold greater oversight of the ombudsman. Perhaps that could be done through a discreet committee that could be the ultimate arbitrator or escalating body.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Paul Sweeney
I share the concerns raised by the petitioner about whether home reports are fit for purpose. I declare an interest as a trustee of the Glasgow City Heritage Trust. In tenemental properties in particular, there are major deficiencies in assessing overall building condition in home reports in Glasgow.
Our colleague Graham Simpson MSP has reconvened the cross-party working group on maintenance of tenement scheme property. Perhaps we should write to Under One Roof, the charity that provides impartial advice to home owners and people purchasing homes, as well as the Built Environment Forum Scotland, which is the secretariat for the working group on tenement maintenance. I know that an action on the matter is to improve the standard and quality of home reports.
I also understand that the Scottish Law Commission is undertaking a project on improving tenement law. It might be that an element of its work is about improving the regulations on home reports. There are major issues with people purchasing property based on highly defective information that leaves them liable for significant repairs to, say, the roof of a tenement that was not assessed as part of a home report. For example, if somebody has a ground floor flat, they are still liable for the roof, which will not have been looked at as part of the home report.
The home report is particularly problematic in relation to tenemental properties.