The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1119 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Paul Sweeney
Morag Ross, do you have any points to add?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Paul Sweeney
That is quite an alarming realisation—that there could potentially be wholesale destruction of legislation in that way.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Paul Sweeney
On the issue of the general powers, the Cabinet Office’s response says:
“The Retained EU Law Substance review has indicated a distinct lack of subordinate legislation making powers to remove REUL from the UK statute book where appropriate, and if required replace that provision with legislation that is more fit for purpose for the UK.”
It gives a reason for that:
“Had the UK never been a member of the EU, many of the areas identified by the substance review would likely already have similar powers to comparable non EU policy areas to amend. The lack of powers is therefore an oddity created by our EU membership”.
That seems to be saying that the extraordinary situation is that the retained EU law does not provide the same provisions in secondary legislation. Would you agree with that assessment, Sir Jonathan, or perhaps Dr Tucker?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Paul Sweeney
Thank you. I want to probe further on the scenario in which the Government did not introduce replacement legislation. As far as I can see, the Parliament would have no capacity whatever to influence that, and it would not be able to perform any form of scrutiny on the revocation of legislation. There might be a difference if the Government were to introduce replacement legislation, which would perhaps provide a mechanism, but if it were simply to revoke laws through secondary measures, there are no means whatever to scrutinise the impacts.
Do you have a view on that, Sir Jonathan?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Paul Sweeney
Yes.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Paul Sweeney
Thank you for that, Dr Tucker.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Paul Sweeney
I thank the witnesses for their helpful contributions.
The powers in clause 15 allow UK ministers and devolved ministers to revoke retained EU law until the end of 2023, or assimilated law from 1 January 2024, and replace it. That power will be available to ministers until 23 June 2026. Where provision is made to replace retained or assimilated law, the replacement provision can implement different policy objectives. I am keen to get your collective views on the scope of the power to revoke and replace retained EU law and assimilated law.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Paul Sweeney
Thanks for that. There is—
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Paul Sweeney
That is fair enough. Thank you.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Paul Sweeney
I will come back in on the point around clause 8 and legislative hierarchy. Clause 8 relates to the removal of the principle of supremacy of EU law. Clause 4 reverses the principle that retained EU law takes precedence over incompatible domestic law. The power in clause 8 will enable ministers to specify that the reversal of the principle does not apply to specific pieces of domestic law and retained EU law and, therefore, that retained EU law continues to take precedence. That will allow ministers to retain the existing hierarchy where that is desirable in order to avoid unintended consequences or to ensure continuity.
The power in clause 8 is exercisable by Scottish and UK ministers in areas of devolved competence. UK ministers are therefore given the power to set the interpretative hierarchy that applies to legislation in devolved areas—bearing in mind that the devolution settlement was never designed with the presumption that we would end up being outside the EU, which has caused disruption.
Do you have any comments to offer on that? I will start with Dr Tucker.