The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1119 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2023
Paul Sweeney
I thank the members of the panel for their contributions.
The committee recently invited views on winter planning in the NHS. It was suggested in many submissions that the development of a whole-systems approach is hindered by the short-term nature of planning and funding. Do panel members have a view on how we can achieve a whole-systems approach in any practical sense?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2023
Paul Sweeney
In its recent report, “Tipping the Scales: the Social and Economic Harm of Poverty in Scotland”, IPPR Scotland highlighted the fact that the cycle of reactive spending is avoidable. Do you have a view on how, against a backdrop of such acute pressures on secondary services, we can disrupt that cycle and transition to an increase in preventative spend?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2023
Paul Sweeney
Do you have any examples of service provision in Scotland or other countries where that transition has been managed and is showing promising signs?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2023
Paul Sweeney
Okay. Written submissions to the committee have noted that the short-term nature of national targets is having an impact on clinical priorities, with decisions made to satisfy expectations as opposed to measuring long-term impact. Do panel members have a view on alternative measures—perhaps through budgeting—that could be used to monitor performance and would allow for longer-term planning? How do we shift from short-termism to a longer-term funding and service delivery model—bearing in mind the complex interactions between the Treasury and the Scottish Government?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2023
Paul Sweeney
That is helpful—thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2023
Paul Sweeney
I might come back to you to ask for further information about the potential for doing deeper analysis on the national health service and its productivity. That might be of interest to the committee, so thanks for that insight.
10:45Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2023
Paul Sweeney
That is helpful. Does anyone have any insights on the benchmarks that are used in relation to other healthcare systems in the developed world?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2023
Paul Sweeney
Ms Martinez, do you have a point to make?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2023
Paul Sweeney
Okay—no problem.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2023
Paul Sweeney
The biggest commodity in the national health service is time. There are opportunities to boost productivity through capital investments and to tackle inefficiencies through targeted process improvements, but GPs, for example, say understandably that they are too busy firefighting to undertake any sort of innovation or process improvement. Do panel members have examples from other countries of models of innovation that have demonstrably improved productivity and that have helped to deliver positive health and social care outcomes?