The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1119 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Paul Sweeney
I also wonder about peer review with other facilities around the world. Having recently visited Copenhagen, I know that Rasmus Christiansen, who runs the H17 facility, offered to come to Glasgow to brief members of the community about his facility’s experience of the difficulties that arose from its introduction, how it was able to resolve that situation with the police, and so on. Have those conversations been going on?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Paul Sweeney
Ms Horsburgh, you just mentioned that Scotland is, by far, not a leading proponent of the introduction of safer overdose prevention facilities. Do you have a view on the pace of, and the process for, the development of the official pilot safer drug consumption facility in Glasgow?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Paul Sweeney
When I read about the Copenhagen facilities, I noticed that there was a cluster in the district with rehabilitation facilities and drug checking facilities available on site. There was also a lot of pastoral support with social work and housing, and there was even a drug users union in the community. Overall, it seemed to be a very good self-reinforcing ecosystem that had massively reduced drug-related criminality but had also achieved great public health outcomes. Is there a significant opportunity to develop a model along those lines in the wider community?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Paul Sweeney
Have you seen any examples from around the world that we should look more closely at emulating?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Paul Sweeney
I thank the panel members for their contributions so far. At the previous joint committee meeting in November 2023, we heard from Susanne Millar from the Glasgow city health and social care partnership that evaluation should be ready to start as soon as the pilot launches, which we just heard will hopefully be in early September. Is that still expected to be the case, and what criteria will the facility be measured against?
12:15Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Paul Sweeney
That is helpful. Will there be on-going real-time evaluation and will there be flexibility to make operational adjustments as issues arise? One thing that was raised at the previous joint committee meeting was opening hours—the Copenhagen model is a 24-hour service, for example. Could such things potentially be adjusted?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Paul Sweeney
That is helpful—thank you.
I turn to the minister. What assessment has the Scottish Government made of the scalability of the model? We spoke about the capital constraints around inhalation, for example, in the operational model that has been deployed. Has consideration been given to how easy it would be to scale the model?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Paul Sweeney
I have a quick question on WEDINOS. It is a great service, but it is effectively a correspondence service. Is there an opportunity with the overdose prevention pilot in Glasgow to set up a co-located facility that could rapidly screen the types of drugs that are circulating in Glasgow, for example, and that would be able to provide an early alert on unsafe substances?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Paul Sweeney
Thank you for your statement, minister.
Do you consider that parliamentary correspondence with the UK Government might be helpful? I know that the House of Lords is sitting today to consider amendments to the bill and that further amendments might be tabled. If this committee were to express a view, would that be helpful in supporting the stakeholders who have expressed concerns, notwithstanding their overall support for moving forward with the bill? Would it be helpful if we gave voice to any issues, particularly on a judge-led approach?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Paul Sweeney
That is helpful.
I noted from the 2018 study the estimated impact on consumer spending of a minimum unit price of 50p. The study highlighted that, on average, there would be a small impact for the consumer, especially moderate drinkers, but the largest impact would be on those who were most likely to buy the products that were liable to be affected—basically, people who were on low incomes who drank at harmful levels. The study also indicated that the dynamic of minimum unit pricing was to transfer income from individual consumers who were problematic drinkers who were perhaps in poverty to retailers. Has the Government made any effort to look at ways to mitigate the effect of that on the household income of those consumers, whether through money advice or targeted interventions?