The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1119 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Paul Sweeney
Thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2024
Paul Sweeney
I have a quick question to put to Professor Bell. You note in your submission that the short-term decisions that IJBs make might reduce spend at the front end but can prove to be more expensive in the longer run, in the whole system. How can we ensure that IJBs make a fuller assessment of any long-term detrimental impact on health outcomes before taking such decisions on budgets?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2024
Paul Sweeney
I thank the witnesses for their points so far. I turn to commissioning and procurement. What would promote a more ethical and productive approach to that? Is the current approach to strategic commissioning the source of the problem and does that need to be revised, or is it the processes themselves, or is it both? I invite the IJB leads to offer their thoughts.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2024
Paul Sweeney
Thanks for that point.
The Accounts Commission report highlights strong examples of innovation, but how could innovation efforts be better supported? Are there barriers to benchmarking, learning from other IJBs, levelling up—if you like—and promoting the best practice across the country as standard? How does that function at present? Are there too many silos and too much fragmentation?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2024
Paul Sweeney
On the point about empowerment, how do you articulate the absurdity, if you like, of the decision that you are being faced with? How do you communicate that to the wider system? Is that something that we could improve?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2024
Paul Sweeney
That is an interesting point. Some strong examples of innovation and efforts to improve the commissioning and contracting of services have been highlighted in the Accounts Commission report. How can those efforts be further supported and the pace of change improved? Are there practical opportunities to do that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2024
Paul Sweeney
I thank the witnesses for their contributions so far.
I want to turn to commissioning and procurement. How can we promote a more ethical and productive approach to those things? Is it the current approach to strategic commissioning that needs to be revised, or is it the processes themselves—or is it both?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2024
Paul Sweeney
We have discussed the pressures on prevention. Given the financial constraints that GPs face, it is a challenge to reconcile the different elements, as has been discussed. Commissioning decisions are often based on which provider offers the lowest cost, but that can have a deadening effect on quality and innovation. The answer from the previous witnesses was to get more resource, particularly in rural areas, which can be quite challenging.
Do you have other views on how we can empower IJBs to look beyond cost and consider the longer-term benefits of investing in innovation and prevention as part of budget decisions? For example, in Glasgow, there was a decision to cut a transition from custody service, which will result in back-up in the prisons and cost the country more money in the long run. How do we avoid those short-termist reactionary decisions in future planning?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2024
Paul Sweeney
Noting Professor Bell’s point about resource, particularly in rural areas, does that drive towards lowest-cost tenders militate against efficiency and good-quality service delivery? Have you noted that tendency? Does that model of chasing the lowest-cost solution need to be changed?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2024
Paul Sweeney
Sharon, do you have any points to make?