The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1119 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Thank you. Dr Coelho, do you have any response to the question?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Dr Green, are you content with the current Canadian legislation, or would you seek to amend it, strengthen it or change it in any way?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
I will move the discussion on. How have palliative care providers in Canada received the legislation since its introduction, in 2016? To what extent has assisted dying been integrated into existing care pathways, and how do they interface?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
I put the question to Dr Green in the first instance, then to Dr Coelho.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
If you had the opportunity to amend the current palliative care legislation in Canada, what would you want to change? I put that question to Dr Coelho.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
I thank both Dr Coelho and Dr Green for their persistence and patience with us as we go through these complex issues.
I want to ask about cases that have come up from constituents. This issue is often discussed in the context of end-of-life care a matter of hours out from death; it might be when people have experienced progression of, say, pancreatic or throat cancer, their quality of life has deteriorated significantly and they are verging on terminal agitation, with sedation considered. They might want the comfort of having the option to end their life at that stage, anticipating that deterioration will follow that course.
Do you have experience of the dynamic playing out in that way in Canada, with people fearing progression of their condition and what that will mean for their quality of life? They might want to have that option, with prior approval, to give themselves comfort as they face a terminal illness with a pretty bleak prognosis. There might come a point later when, once a certain threshold has been passed, they can trigger the end of their life on their own terms. Is that a common characteristic of how this plays out?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
In Victoria and elsewhere in Australia, can people take the decision early, shortly after receiving a terminal diagnosis, in anticipation of their condition deteriorating over time? For example, if someone has pancreatic cancer and they know that the usual course will lead to significant pain later, as the condition progresses, and that it may ultimately lead to terminal delirium or agitation, can they decide that they will administer the medication to end their life at the point where that real deterioration takes place? Rather than the decision being made at the point when the medication has to be administered, can the decision be made in anticipation that the condition will deteriorate over time, with agreement with clinicians or relatives that the medication will be administered at that point?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
That is helpful. Thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Yes. It was about whether the individual would have sovereignty after the agreement had been put in place, in that, at any point in the progression of their condition, they could determine when to take the medication. There may be a scenario where someone enters a state of delirium and they are not necessarily aware of their surroundings. At what point does that sovereignty become questionable? Can they have a pre-emptive understanding with relatives who will help them to take the drug?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
In relation to the substances that can be used, in Australia, is that kept open and is a review done independently by practitioners, or does the legislation define the substances?