The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1119 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Does anyone else have a view on that point?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Please do.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Is it quite difficult to determine whether the diagnosis was the stimulus for mental ill health or whether it was a pre-existing condition?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Do you have concerns that the qualifying criteria for eligibility, as defined in the bill, are too restrictive?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
I do not know whether you have had an opportunity to look at the UK bill as introduced—the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill—but its qualifying criteria do not refer to mental illness. However, at clause 30, it states that the secretary of state may introduce a code of practice on
“the assessment of whether a person has a clear and settled intention to end their own life”,
which would include
“recognising and taking account of the effects of depression or other mental disorders (within the meaning of the Mental Health Act 1983) that may impair a person’s decision-making”.
Is that perhaps a better definition?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
That is helpful.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
The financial memorandum to the bill estimates that there will be 25 assisted deaths in the first year, rising to 400 deaths by year 20. That is also based on an assumption that 33 per cent of people who enter the process will not proceed. Do those projections seem like a workable caseload?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
I turn to the issue of capacity, which we have discussed to some extent already. Does either of you have any concerns about the ability of non-psychiatric doctors to assess the capacity of people seeking an assisted death?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
I thank our witnesses for joining us this morning.
I want to begin with the crossover or interface between mental and terminal illness. The bill, as introduced, states that, to be eligible for assisted dying, the person must have the mental capacity to make the request for an assisted death. Included in the definition of capacity is that a person should not be
“suffering from any mental disorder which might affect the making of the request”,
with “mental disorder” defined under section 328 of the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003 as
“any ... mental illness ... personality disorder; or ... learning disability”.
How common is it for people facing the end of their lives to be suffering from mental health problems such as depression and anxiety?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Are you concerned that “mental illness”, as defined in the 2003 act, would be a disqualifying criterion?