The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1119 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Thank you very much. Are there any final remarks from witnesses, before I conclude?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 14 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
On 11 September 2023, the Lord Advocate stated her intention to publish a prosecution policy for the safer consumption facility. Do you have any insight on when that will be published?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 14 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
I thank the cabinet secretary and his colleagues for their comments so far. Does the cabinet secretary have any insight on the nature of, or the reason for, the delays with NHS Scotland Assure’s approval of the facility at Hunter Street?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 14 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Last year, I had the opportunity to visit Copenhagen to see how its model operates. I was struck by how sophisticated it is. One of the key aspects of the visit was to understand the interface between the safer consumption facility, the overdose prevention facility and referral pathways into rehabilitation. The staff said that they had noted a significant increase in interest in accessing rehabilitation. Sometimes, it is non-linear—people go into rehabilitation and then come back to use the facility, or vice versa. Staff noted that services were in close proximity; it was a matter of minutes to walk to the residential rehabilitation facility.
I have just checked, and the closest rehabilitation facility to Hunter Street is the Thistle centre, as it will be known, which is about 4.5 miles away. The Phoenix Futures centre is the closest one in Anniesland. Does the cabinet secretary have a longer-term view that we should try to co-locate or at least bring facilities into closer proximity where there are concentrations of street injection?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 14 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Does the cabinet secretary recognise that the recruitment has been very positive? There have been more than 700 applications for about 34 posts in the centre, which is encouraging. That is a significant overhead for operating one facility, which might present challenges when it comes to scaling up such facilities. Have the cabinet secretary and his colleagues considered how to create a hub model, with some outreach, which might be less expensive to establish?
In relation to the pattern of where discarded needles are clustered in Glasgow city centre, there is an element in the east end around the Barrowlands and a cluster near George Square and Central station. Might there be an opportunity to build the main base at Hunter Street and then have a series of satellite facilities or perhaps even mobile facilities along the lines of the converted ambulance that the unofficial pilot utilised? Are those options for how we develop the pilot? Is there scope for doing something such as that to try to capture more people? We know that people do not tend to travel very far from where they purchase drugs to where they inject them.
Criminal Justice Committee, Health Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 14 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
It is certainly timely that the pilot is getting under way, given that there has been a reported increase in street injection in Glasgow. I am concerned about the 12-hour gap in operation between 9 pm and 9 am. Does the cabinet secretary share that concern? Should there be an effort to increase operating hours, if that is deemed to be necessary by the health and social care partnership?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 14 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Is there a proactive engagement plan to enable colleagues across the Scottish Government, local authorities and the UK Government to see the facility in operation, once it is established? Recently, I happened to meet Dame Diana Johnson, who, as the Home Office minister, expressed a keen interest in coming to see it and was very open minded about how it could be developed. Is there an active plan for the Scottish Government to invite colleagues to see the facility in operation?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
I think that the financial memorandum to the bill sets aside funding for training purposes, but it does not specifically mention training in relation to assessing capacity. Would you prefer that that was further clarified in the bill?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
That is helpful.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Thank you, convener, and thanks to the witnesses for their insightful comments so far.
A number of respondents to our calls for views on the bill have raised the question whether doctors would have a “duty to raise” assisted dying as a reasonable treatment option with end-of-life patients, as current court decisions, such as Montgomery v North Lanarkshire Health Board, require doctors to discuss all reasonable treatment options with their patients so that the patient can make a fully informed decision.
Clause 4(1) of the UK bill introduced by Kim Leadbeater MP explicitly refers to no “duty to raise” the subject with patients and clause 4(2) clarifies that by providing that medical practitioners may exercise “their professional judgement”.
In the Scottish bill by Liam McArthur MSP, section 18(1) refers to a general requirement. Indeed, it provides that
“An individual is not under any duty (whether arising from any statutory or legal requirement) to participate in anything authorised by this Act to which that individual has a conscientious objection.”
Considering the bill as drafted, do you think that the status of assisted dying as a reasonable treatment option needs to be further clarified? Dr Neal, you could perhaps start us off.