Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 12 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1119 contributions

|

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

National Care Service (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 26 November 2024

Paul Sweeney

Do any of your colleagues wish to come in on that?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

National Care Service (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 26 November 2024

Paul Sweeney

Clearly, there is a problem with gathering support from trade unions, local authorities and, indeed, Parliament. Do you think that one way to break through that impasse would be by highlighting where there are opportunities to implement reforms incrementally using existing legislation, and then pointing out where there is a clear need for a discrete piece of overarching legislation that could come in later? Trade unions have expressed a view that action is needed in the social care sector now, and perhaps they would be more likely to lend you their support if certain actions were taken sooner.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Paul Sweeney

Do Mr Okasha and Ms Dalrymple have any views on the definition of “terminal”?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Paul Sweeney

What amendments to the definition might satisfy you?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Paul Sweeney

What is your view on including a prognostic timescale? Would you be content to include in the definition something equivalent to the timescale in the UK bill that I mentioned, which is six months?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Paul Sweeney

Of course, convener. My question is about the European convention on human rights. Regardless of what the bill defines as a terminal illness, there might be scope for the courts to extend that in future. Does anyone have concerns about that?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Paul Sweeney

I thank the witnesses for their answers so far and will pick up on some points that were raised during last week’s meeting regarding the seniority and specialty of doctors. Are you concerned that the bill is not sufficiently specific about the grade of doctors who would undertake the assessments? Should the bill be amended to define that more clearly?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Paul Sweeney

I also want to ask about the risk of doctor shopping, which is the colloquial expression. There is a concern that, if someone seeks an assisted death and there is a dispute with clinicians, there may be sufficient scope in the bill for people to seek referrals to a point at which they can get what they want, regardless of the concerns that have been raised by clinicians. There does not seem to be provision for any clinician to raise concerns about safeguarding, for example, in respect of that. Do you share that concern, or do you have a view on whether there should be tighter regulations on the nature of referrals and on who does the referring? If there is a need for a second opinion, should the initial clinician, if they are minded to grant the request for assisted dying, be able to refer onwards to someone who might be in agreement, or should it be more neutral, or more regulated?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Paul Sweeney

Is that the idea of having an ethics panel, or some sort of central register, as defined in the bill? Would that be a more satisfactory structure for you?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Paul Sweeney

That is helpful. Thank you.