The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1119 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Paul Sweeney
I appreciate those answers.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Paul Sweeney
That is helpful. I suppose that necessity is sometimes the mother of invention. You have described the time constraints that might drive behaviours that are not necessarily malicious or malign in intent but that are simply a by-product of other pressures in the system. Your suggestions are helpful and could assist.
Dr Fox, in her evidence to the committee, described the trend towards drafting “skeleton bills” that are, because of their architecture, prone to be massively expanded on by secondary legislation. That trend in the design of legislation might be why the propensity to use delegated powers in such a way has expanded significantly in recent years. What might recent primary legislation and the nature of the powers that have been given to ministers mean for the exercise of executive powers in future? Do you agree with the observation about skeleton bills and that the architecture of bills has substantially changed in recent years, which has perhaps driven some of the behaviours that we have talked about and expanded the use of secondary legislation?
That could tie into your points about a code, Professor Tierney, or even legislation to tighten up the design of bills.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Paul Sweeney
It is certainly a cause for concern. Sir Jonathan, do you have any thoughts on that question?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Paul Sweeney
Thank you to our witnesses for giving such comprehensive and expert evidence. It seems to me that perhaps this is all a function of the lack of a codified constitution, but perhaps that is a more fundamental debate that we need to have.
I was intrigued by the idea of introducing a definition of urgency as a check. Could that be a lever for stopping the ratchet from tightening? What practical impact might that have on the future exercise of executive power? I direct that question, in the first instance, to Sir Jonathan.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
Paul Sweeney
Sorry about that. The discussion has been really interesting to follow, and I thank both the witnesses for their insights.
I have a question for Ms Ross. From a historical perspective, as much as anything else, does the increasing use of the made affirmative procedure represent a general shift of legislative power away from the Parliament towards the Executive? Is that a valid observation?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
Paul Sweeney
That is a helpful insight. I am sure that you will have a perspective on that, Dr Fox, given the study that you did in the House of Commons in 2017. Controlling for the pandemic, what would be your general impression from a historical perspective? Is there a long-term trajectory of the erosion of parliamentary power relative to the Executive? Should that be of concern to members of the Scottish Parliament as well as members of the House of Commons?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
Paul Sweeney
That is an interesting insight—the perils of elective dictatorship. It is an interesting point to hold in perspective in relation to the Scottish Parliament, because the parliamentary arithmetic here is somewhat different and there is scope for us to scrutinise and to hold the Executive’s feet to the fire on inadequate provision in bills and ensure that they are not just skeletons, as you put it. That is worth considering.
It was helpful to have that stated explicitly for the purposes of what we are trying to achieve, so thank you for those non-technical takes. Is there anything further that you want to add that we have not considered about the made affirmative procedure and its scrutiny process? Both witnesses should feel free to jump in.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
Paul Sweeney
Can you hear me all right now, convener?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
Paul Sweeney
[Inaudible.]—to understand some of the—
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2021
Paul Sweeney
I am sympathetic to the petitioner’s requests, which are clearly personally significant. I note the legislative change with regard to organ donation, which has created an opt-out system, and I do not see why the same principle cannot apply to all forms of post mortems or physical interventions on the body. There could be a system of proactive consent, whereby the next of kin could express their desire that such things did not take place. That is what happens with organ donation, which people now have to opt out of, and we could have a look at how those two issues interact.