Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 30 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 824 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 19 November 2025

Emma Roddick

I will speak to Evelyn Tweed’s amendment 104. The committee is aware that part 1 of the bill sets out the three target topics under which Scottish ministers must set statutory targets. As highlighted in the stage 1 report, it has become apparent that the second target topic—the status of threatened species—is being interpreted by some stakeholders to mean only species that are currently listed as endangered, which is a narrower interpretation than was intended.

As is noted in the policy memorandum for the bill, the intention is that

“The term ‘threatened species’ comprises species that are under threat now, species that have populations that are declining and species that may potentially be under threat in the future. The target topic intended to incorporate species at threat of extinction, species abundance and distribution, population size of exploited species, as well as genetic diversity.”

Amendment 104 therefore seeks to update the wording in new section 2C(1)(a) of the Nature Conservation (Scotland) Act 2004 to more accurately capture that wider definition of “threatened species” and provide reassurance. I am grateful to the cabinet secretary for working with Evelyn Tweed on the issue.

For those reasons, I encourage members to support amendment 104.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 19 November 2025

Emma Roddick

My amendments are small but important. The bill as it is drafted places a duty on Environmental Standards Scotland to submit to the Scottish ministers a report on the outcome of reviews and assessments that are carried out under new section 2G(1)(a) and (b) of the 2004 act, inserted by section 1(3) of the bill.

During the stage 1 evidence session, Environmental Standards Scotland suggested that, as an independent body that is directly accountable to the Parliament, it would be more appropriate for it to lay any reports that it made under new section 2G directly in the Parliament, rather than before the Scottish ministers. The committee, in its stage 1 report on the bill, recommended that the Scottish Government should enable ESS

“to lay its reports under section 2G directly in the Scottish Parliament”.

My amendments 50 and 51 reflect the committee’s recommendations to amend the bill to that effect, so I encourage the committee to support them.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 November 2025

Emma Roddick

Could any more be done to ensure that FOI rights keep pace with changes in how public services are delivered?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 November 2025

Emma Roddick

Good morning. Do you support the proposal for the Parliament to have a more active role in reviewing section 5 reports? In your view, would that parliamentary scrutiny lead to more timely and transparent designation of bodies?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 November 2025

Emma Roddick

I have a couple of questions for the Law Society. Do you support the proposal for Parliament to have a more active role in reviewing section 5 reports? Would that parliamentary scrutiny lead to the more timely and transparent designation of bodies?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 November 2025

Emma Roddick

We will look forward to that correspondence. Chris, do you have anything to add?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 November 2025

Emma Roddick

More generally, the bill would give the Scottish Parliament the power to designate organisations that deliver public functions or services as public authorities. Do you have a view on that approach?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 November 2025

Emma Roddick

Yes—that is really helpful. Thinking of instances where the situation is not quite as clear cut and where people may struggle to get information that they are looking for, Unison and others have suggested in evidence to the committee that FOI rights should follow the public pound. Would a criteria or funding-based approach to designation of public bodies be more desirable for information requesters than the current organisation-by-organisation model?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Crofting and Scottish Land Court Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Emma Roddick

Hopefully, Gaelic speakers also believe that we should cling dearly to the language.

You mentioned that there are many crofters for whom Gaelic is their first language and that some terms of phrase, even relating to land rights, might not directly translate. Are there particular situations where that has arisen so far in the court, or is the minister just generally aware that that can be a factor?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Crofting and Scottish Land Court Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Emma Roddick

The bill retains the eligibility requirements, including the requirement for a Gaelic-speaking member. How important is that requirement, given the provisions of the Scottish Languages Act 2025, which seek to strengthen and actively promote Gaelic?