The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 824 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Emma Roddick
I will speak to Evelyn Tweed’s amendment 104. The committee is aware that part 1 of the bill sets out the three target topics under which Scottish ministers must set statutory targets. As highlighted in the stage 1 report, it has become apparent that the second target topic—the status of threatened species—is being interpreted by some stakeholders to mean only species that are currently listed as endangered, which is a narrower interpretation than was intended.
As is noted in the policy memorandum for the bill, the intention is that
“The term ‘threatened species’ comprises species that are under threat now, species that have populations that are declining and species that may potentially be under threat in the future. The target topic intended to incorporate species at threat of extinction, species abundance and distribution, population size of exploited species, as well as genetic diversity.”
Amendment 104 therefore seeks to update the wording in new section 2C(1)(a) of the Nature Conservation (Scotland) Act 2004 to more accurately capture that wider definition of “threatened species” and provide reassurance. I am grateful to the cabinet secretary for working with Evelyn Tweed on the issue.
For those reasons, I encourage members to support amendment 104.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Emma Roddick
My amendments are small but important. The bill as it is drafted places a duty on Environmental Standards Scotland to submit to the Scottish ministers a report on the outcome of reviews and assessments that are carried out under new section 2G(1)(a) and (b) of the 2004 act, inserted by section 1(3) of the bill.
During the stage 1 evidence session, Environmental Standards Scotland suggested that, as an independent body that is directly accountable to the Parliament, it would be more appropriate for it to lay any reports that it made under new section 2G directly in the Parliament, rather than before the Scottish ministers. The committee, in its stage 1 report on the bill, recommended that the Scottish Government should enable ESS
“to lay its reports under section 2G directly in the Scottish Parliament”.
My amendments 50 and 51 reflect the committee’s recommendations to amend the bill to that effect, so I encourage the committee to support them.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Emma Roddick
Could any more be done to ensure that FOI rights keep pace with changes in how public services are delivered?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Emma Roddick
Good morning. Do you support the proposal for the Parliament to have a more active role in reviewing section 5 reports? In your view, would that parliamentary scrutiny lead to more timely and transparent designation of bodies?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Emma Roddick
I have a couple of questions for the Law Society. Do you support the proposal for Parliament to have a more active role in reviewing section 5 reports? Would that parliamentary scrutiny lead to the more timely and transparent designation of bodies?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Emma Roddick
We will look forward to that correspondence. Chris, do you have anything to add?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Emma Roddick
More generally, the bill would give the Scottish Parliament the power to designate organisations that deliver public functions or services as public authorities. Do you have a view on that approach?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Emma Roddick
Yes—that is really helpful. Thinking of instances where the situation is not quite as clear cut and where people may struggle to get information that they are looking for, Unison and others have suggested in evidence to the committee that FOI rights should follow the public pound. Would a criteria or funding-based approach to designation of public bodies be more desirable for information requesters than the current organisation-by-organisation model?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Emma Roddick
Hopefully, Gaelic speakers also believe that we should cling dearly to the language.
You mentioned that there are many crofters for whom Gaelic is their first language and that some terms of phrase, even relating to land rights, might not directly translate. Are there particular situations where that has arisen so far in the court, or is the minister just generally aware that that can be a factor?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Emma Roddick
The bill retains the eligibility requirements, including the requirement for a Gaelic-speaking member. How important is that requirement, given the provisions of the Scottish Languages Act 2025, which seek to strengthen and actively promote Gaelic?