The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 606 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 March 2023
Emma Roddick
We have heard quite a few concerns about lack of diversity being an issue because of the criteria. Does the cabinet secretary share those concerns to any extent, and does she think that the bill provides enough scope to get around that issue?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Emma Roddick
I would like to put to Nick Holroyd an issue that we discussed earlier with Martin Tyson. Is it appropriate for OSCR to maintain a publicly searchable record of trustees who have been disqualified? Does that present any issues around the handling of sensitive personal data?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Emma Roddick
My first question is for Keith Macpherson. Most of the discussion around whether it is important or sensible to have the same disqualification criteria across the UK is focused on the comparison with England and Wales, but I was interested in the fact that you mentioned Northern Ireland in your submission. Why do you think that it is important to have consistent disqualification criteria in different jurisdictions? Are there particular interactions with Northern Ireland that the committee should consider?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Emma Roddick
You have pre-empted my next question, because I was going to pick up on the question of a declaration. Will you expand on why, in your view, it would be helpful to have such a declaration in addition to the register? Would that force charities to declare that someone had never been disqualified, even if they did not currently appear on the register?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Emma Roddick
Do you agree with the proposal to extend the disqualification criteria to senior management positions, and do you anticipate that having any implications for recruitment?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Emma Roddick
I will move on to Alan Eccles. I have read your submission, but what are your thoughts on the comments that have been made by previous witnesses that measures for disqualification are too punitive and restrictive on those wishing to act as trustees?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Emma Roddick
Are there any concerns that the disqualification criteria might disproportionately impact certain demographics and not others? I am thinking, in particular, of charities that work among particular demographics, which might be looking for people with lived experience.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Emma Roddick
Okay—
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Emma Roddick
That brings me nicely on to another question that I wanted to ask—
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Emma Roddick
In last week’s session, we heard concerns that the disqualification criteria might disproportionately impact certain demographics and, in particular, charities that work in sectors in which lived experience is valued, and that the application of the disqualification criteria might become a barrier. Does anybody in the room share those concerns?