The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 824 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Emma Roddick
Is there anything else that could help FOI rights keep pace with changes in public service delivery generally?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Emma Roddick
Kevin Dunion, I have some questions for you in relation to the Scottish Information Commissioner. Based on your experience, do you support the changes to some of the commissioner’s enforcement powers? Are there any that you would strengthen or reconsider?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Emma Roddick
Did you not use those powers because it was going to be difficult, or did you just not find it necessary?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Emma Roddick
In the earlier evidence session, there was a suggestion that there could be triggers for starting the designation process and that, once those were met, it would be almost automatic that designation would be considered. Alex Parsons, you might want to address that in your response.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Emma Roddick
On section 5 powers on designation, a few respondents highlighted that the bill’s provisions might not meaningfully incentivise ministers to make use of those powers. What is your assessment of the root causes of the delay in making use of those powers, and do the bill’s provisions address those causes?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Emma Roddick
In general, would the parliamentary route to designation be faster?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Emma Roddick
Minister, you said that, because this is a non-Government bill, you did not have the opportunity to feed in to the specifics. Would you potentially be looking to amend this section of the bill at later stages? If so, how?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Emma Roddick
We know that there tends to be displacement when breed-specific restrictions, regulations or legislations are brought in, and different breeds start to become involved in whatever the regulation was looking to prevent. Is there concern that different breeds might be subject to the kind of dangerous racing that greyhounds are put through, which we have been discussing, and that the same welfare risk would apply to those breeds?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Emma Roddick
The bill creates two offences. The last time you gave evidence on the bill, in its early stages, there was discussion of dogs from Scotland being raced in England. Do you see there being an opportunity in the bill as drafted, or through the amendments that you hope to lodge, to do something about that behaviour if it is—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Emma Roddick
Sure.