The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 858 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Emma Roddick
My question is very much tied in with that, because I want to pick up on the same comment from Donna Smith. Where I live, it is much faster for me to go out and buy frozen lamb from New Zealand than it is for me to buy Scottish lamb in the supermarkets. However, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs’s statistics show that we produce more lamb than we eat in this country. Trade is reserved to the UK, but could the Scottish Government be doing more through the climate change plan or other policy areas to encourage people to eat what we produce? As you say, it does not really matter how that lamb was reared in New Zealand; it has travelled all the way across the globe, and that was not necessary.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Emma Roddick
What about deer? Is there more work to be done around managing deer numbers and using that venison?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Emma Roddick
With the previous witnesses, we talked about shipping lamb across the world and overproducing what we need here. Is it more important for us to focus on behaviour change around the type of food that is being produced near us?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Emma Roddick
I will go back to the point about moving the goalposts. A bit of sympathy was expressed with the situation that regulators are in. Whose behaviour would need to change in order to get to the point where there is consistency of approach and clarity?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Emma Roddick
We have already touched on a few of the practical barriers in forestry, but are there specific barriers that would put delivery of the climate change plan ambitions at risk? If so, are any policies or proposals missing from this draft that you think could address those?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Emma Roddick
I am curious about what is needed for a just transition for Scotland’s land use sectors. We heard from the witnesses on the previous panel about the interaction between agriculture and forestry. Does more need to be done, and is that properly evidenced in the draft plan?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Emma Roddick
Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Emma Roddick
Minister, to pick up on your back and forth with Rhoda Grant on the small producers pilot fund, can you give any reassurance about the fund? Is it the Scottish Government’s intention that the fund will continue for the foreseeable future?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Emma Roddick
I appreciate that the issue is complex, but the pilot fund is filling gaps—does the Government intend to carry on with the fund in some form?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Emma Roddick
My amendment 256 would allow ministers to introduce, by regulation, the ability for local authorities to issue fixed-penalty notices in relation to any byelaws that they introduce to prevent wildfires. The amendment came about through conversations with the Highland Council. As members will know, the byelaws that were recently introduced by the Cairngorms National Park Authority in order to prevent wildfires were met with a great reaction locally. Many constituents, including some who were impacted by the Dava moor fire this year, have written to me asking for similar legislation to be brought in outwith the park area. I have made that case on their behalf to multiple councils, and I believe that that case is very strong.
However, council officers have shared with me that an inability to issue fixed-penalty notices is preventing them from introducing their own byelaws, because they need to have confidence that such byelaws would be enforceable and that the penalties would be known and clear and could act as a deterrent. Council officers cannot be sure that they will be able to resource that process if there is no ability to fine. I would like local authorities to be given the opportunity to manage their byelaws in the same way that we are allowing national parks to manage their byelaws through the bill. The issue was mentioned in some responses to the committee’s call for views at stage 1. Multiple respondents suggested, in response to the question on the new national park powers—which were overwhelmingly supported—that those powers could be extended to other authorities as well.
I would be interested to hear from the minister about what is under consideration, what the Government’s position is on local authorities being able to issue fixed-penalty notices, and whether the Government will support that ask from those councils that are most at risk of wildfire.
I move amendment 256.