The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 908 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
You are talking about fairness and saying that if we do something on the constituency side it should happen on the regional side. Currently, the bill provides for a by-election on the constituency side in which the recalled member can stand but not one on the regional side. If you had a one-step process on both sides, they would be closer to each other than the current proposal.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
There is the regional list. The way that those people who are elected from the regional list is calculated is partly based on the constituency elections—the overall calculation takes into consideration each constituency. If the goal is simply to hold individuals to account for their conduct, should we be looking at retaining the proportionality and providing the parity between the two systems that you are looking for?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
There would be no by-election if that happened on the regional side.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
Absolutely. The question that I asked earlier about replacing constituency recallees with a member of their own party was about precisely that concern about retaining the proportionality of the overall Parliament.
Thinking about the bill as it stands and the system that it is working in, I have previously raised with witnesses the fact that, if a regional MSP faces a recall petition but is successful in being returned, their party would, under the current system, need to sign off on that and provide a nomination certificate. Do you think that parties would be required to do that? They might also have an issue with the individual who got returned through their party list.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
In such a case, would you force the party to sign off on that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
The evidence that we have gathered so far is that it is quite complex. We have rarely been at a point at which witnesses have agreed on the way forward. We have even had people change their minds while they were sitting in front of the committee.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
But 10 per cent would be enough of a message to remove that person from the job.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
Why would you not do that for a constituency member?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
Would a one-step process result in better parity than is in your bill currently, though, given that there is a by-election on one side and not on the other?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
Why not?